Trust-based decision-making system for action selection by autonomous agents

Callebert, Lucile; Lourdeaux, Domitile; Barthès, Jean-Paul

doi:10.1109/cscwd.2016.7565953

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, in our approach the natural language interaction between SoS users and PAs is much more simple, as in SoS usually the interactions involve requests for SoS functionalities for achieving the expected results of the SoS goal. Conversely, usually embodied agents of virtual reality take a more social and psychological perspective, approaching aspects such as emotions and trust (Callebert et al [15]). Furthermore, the conversations also tend to be longer in order to exploit such an aspects.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing Proactive Interfaces for Cooperation using Systems of Systems

Wanderley

Abel

Paraíso

2018

2018 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design ((CSCWD))

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cooperation is a fundamental trait of Systems of Systems (SoS). In this paper we discuss the design and implementation of proactive vocal interfaces with the goal of improving and stimulating cooperation between users and constituent systems. Our approach is based on intelligent personal assistants displaying proactive behavior and capable of interacting vocally. The paper discusses the main challenges for integrating proactive behavior into SoS interfaces, as well as for using them. The proposed approach is generic and can be applied to different domains.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing Proactive Interfaces for Cooperation using Systems of Systems

Wanderley

Abel

Paraíso

2018

2018 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design ((CSCWD))

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ces travaux d'opérationnalisation se heurtent alors à un écueil : la sensibilité. En effet, comme le montre [7], le problème vient du fait qu'ajouter des processus cognitifs différents peut engendrer, selon le modèle d'agent, soit des comportements incohérents, voir contradictoires soit des comportements lisses résultant d'une moyenne et donc peu intelligibles. Sans vouloir modéliser des comportements caricaturaux, il est utile que les comportements cognitifs soit perçus et reconnus.…”

Section: Représentativité Sensibilité Et Intelligibilité Des Comporte...unclassified

OPACK : un modèle intégrateur d’agent pour la génération de comportements induits par des modèles cognitifs modulaires

de Blauwe,

Sabouret,

Lourdeaux

2024

Revue Ouverte d'Intelligence Artificielle

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Other approaches propose some trust-based decisionmaking models [14], [15] but we currently omit the question of trust as we consider that stakeholders have levels of expertise known in advance and that no one intends to harm the collaborative matching.…”

Section: B Collaboration Modelingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative model-based matching of heterogeneous models

Bennani

Hamlaoui²,

Nassar³

et al. 2018

2018 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design ((CSCWD))

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Design of complex systems implies various points of view expressed by stakeholders with different areas of expertise. Each stakeholder describes his model in a Domain Specific Language, according to his point of view. Ensuring the consistency of the global system and building a cross view is a challenging task. It requires the involvement of all stakeholders to produce intermodel correspondences that satisfy their concerns. In this paper, we first introduce a metamodel of collaboration that formalizes collaborative work, then we use this metamodel to define a collaborative process for heterogeneous design models matching. This approach establishes semantic links at metamodel level by following a group decision-making process, then it refines those links semi-automatically at model level by exploiting their semantics.

show abstract

Trust-based decision-making system for action selection by autonomous agents

Cited by 4 publications

References 4 publications

Designing Proactive Interfaces for Cooperation using Systems of Systems

Designing Proactive Interfaces for Cooperation using Systems of Systems

OPACK : un modèle intégrateur d’agent pour la génération de comportements induits par des modèles cognitifs modulaires

Collaborative model-based matching of heterogeneous models

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About