Trust Formation in University–Industry Collaborations in the U.S. Biotechnology Industry: IP Policies, Shared Governance, and Champions*,†

Abstract

Haggling over rights to potential inventions can be a major roadblock to successful university-industry (UI) collaborations. Yet such collaborations are critical for innovation in science-based industries. This study examines the roles of universities' intellectual property (IP) policies and of shared governance for trust formation between academe and industry. The study also examines how UI champions moderate this process and how trust between university and industry partners affects UI collaboration outcomes. The analysis of survey data of 105 recent UI collaborations in the U.S. biotechnology industry indicates that the flexibility and transparency of university IP policies and shared governance by UI partners are both positively related to trust formation. The activities of UI champions amplify the positive effects of shared governance and at the same time reduce the importance of university IP policies for trust formation between UI partners. The amount of trust between partners is positively related to knowledge transfer and innovation performance. The findings suggest that despite widely reported industry concerns over the control of IP, UI research partners can develop a trustful environment and thereby plant the seeds for a successful collaboration. In order to enhance trust, companies should not only consider university IP policies, but also need to actively engage in shared governance with university partners. UI collaboration champions can help shift the attention of company managers from formal rules set by university IP policies toward shared project planning, coordination, and implementation with university partners.

Knowledge transfer and university-business relations: Current trends in research

“…Then comes the identification and reinforcement of the strong and weak points of the universities, the role of government in management, the stabilization of relations and finally, the business results from an economic perspective and the contribution made to the university institution (Salled & Omar, 2013; -704-Intangible Capital -https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.990 Kalar & Antoncic, 2015;Casimiro & Macamo, 2016;Chen et al, 2016;Fu & Li, 2016;Giunta et al 2016). Bastieler et al (2015) propose that transparency in the management of intellectual property analysis at universities ensures greater confidence in UBRs by their members.…”

An Examination of Cluster and Non-Cluster Firms’ Knowledge-Based Activities

“…For example, dedicated biotechnology firms (DBFs) operate on the cutting edge of research by pushing the frontiers of science while exploring opportunities for commercialisation (Momma and Sharp, 1999). To do so, they often rely on identifying universities' research in the early stages when new or breakthrough discoveries typically emerge (Bstieler et al, 2015).…”

Sustainability-Oriented Innovation in the Minerals Industry: An Empirical Study on the Effect of Non-Geographical Proximity Dimensions

“…Researchers have shown that in addition to lowering the uncertainty of interactions in the context of technological innovations at large, for instance by regulating the intellectual property rights [62], rules and laws can also act as underlying mechanisms to align the economic and environmental objectives in the quest for eco-…”