Trust opportunistic routing protocol in multi-hop wireless networks

Wang, Bo; HuangChuanhe,; YangWenzhong,; WangTong,

doi:10.1109/wcins.2010.5541842

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Different trust computational approaches have been introduced as different trust models. Our study shows that E2TX [52], RTOR [180] and its close relatives, TORDP and GEOTOR [181], are metrics that accommodate trust via a very simple direct trust model. ETOR [33] extends the trust model to include indirect trust.…”

Section: A Parameters Developmentmentioning

confidence: 83%

“…where B k is the channel k's bandwidth, S represent the received signal power from node i at node j and the total primary-to-CR interference power at CR node j, respectively, and G 0 denotes the white Gaussian noise power spectral density. • Trustworthiness and ETX (E2TX) [52]: The ETX metric estimates the PDP of a wireless link using periodic measurements and then trusts these measurements for the next 5 or 10 minutes. In E2TX, the trustworthiness of the ETX metric is revisited.…”

Section: • Multicast Expected Advancement Rate (Mear) I-mearmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Opportunistic routing metrics: A timely one-stop tutorial survey

Abdollahi

Eshghi

Kelarestaghi

et al. 2020

Journal of Network and Computer Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

High-speed, low latency, and heterogeneity features of 5G, as the common denominator of many emerging and classic wireless applications, have put wireless technology back in the spotlight. Continuous connectivity requirement in low-power and wide-reach networks underlines the need for more efficient routing over scarce wireless resources, in multi-hp scenarios. In this regard, Opportunistic Routing (OR), which utilizes the broadcast nature of wireless media to provide transmission cooperation amongst a selected number of overhearing nodes, has become more promising than ever. Crucial to the overall network performance, which nodes to participate and where they stand on the transmission-priority hierarchy, are decided by userdefined OR metrics embedded in OR protocols. Therefore, the task of choosing or designing an appropriate OR metric is a critical one. The numerousness, proprietary notations, and the objective variousness of OR metrics can cause the interested researcher to lose insight and become overwhelmed, making the metric selection or design effort-intensive. While there are not any comprehensive OR metrics surveys in the literature, those who partially address the subject are non-exhaustive and lacking in detail. Furthermore, they offer limited insight regarding related taxonomy and future research recommendations. In this paper, starting with a custom tutorial with a new look to OR and OR metrics, we devise a new framework for OR metric design. Introducing a new taxonomy enables us to take a structured, investigative, and comparative approach to OR metrics, supported by extensive simulations. Exhaustive coverage of OR metrics, formulated in a unified notation, is presented with sufficient details. Self-explanatory, easy-to-grasp, and visual-friendly quick references are provided, which can be used independently from the rest of the paper. Finally, a new insightful framework for future research directions is developed. This tutorial-survey has been organized to benefit both generalists and OR specialists equally, and to be used not only in its entirety but selectively as well.

show abstract

Section: A Parameters Developmentmentioning

confidence: 83%

Section: • Multicast Expected Advancement Rate (Mear) I-mearmentioning

confidence: 99%

Opportunistic routing metrics: A timely one-stop tutorial survey

Abdollahi

Eshghi

Kelarestaghi

et al. 2020

Journal of Network and Computer Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this way may cause a relay node overload, fluid overload, can't get multiple relay node in cooperative communication. Finally affect system performance [9]. This paper presents techniques for radio and television relay service in routing method which get node's time-delay and power information, obtained the value of the system interrupt selection, and as a decision of threshold, tale the relay node selection.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Based on Time-Delay and Bandwidth Relay Selection Algorithm for Radio and Television Services

Zhang

Luan

et al. 2013

AMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Proposed a relay routing method for Radio and TV services, the method through obtaining the nodes time-delay and power information, obtained the value of the system interrupt decisions, and as a decision threshold to select the relay node. While in consideration of link priorities and fairness, designed a relay routing protocol that can dynamically change the route when the network changed. Simulation results show that this protocol can be expanded coverage, reduced communication blind spots, increase system throughput and enhance the quality of service.

show abstract

Comparative study of trust and reputation systems for wireless sensor networks

Khalid

Khan

Madani

et al. 2012

Security Comm Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are emerging as useful technology for information extraction from the surrounding environment by using numerous small-sized sensor nodes that are mostly deployed in sensitive, unattended, and (sometimes) hostile territories. Traditional cryptographic approaches are widely used to provide security in WSN. However, because of unattended and insecure deployment, a sensor node may be physically captured by an adversary who may acquire the underlying secret keys, or a subset thereof, to access the critical data and/or other nodes present in the network. Moreover, a node may not properly operate because of insufficient resources or problems in the network link. In recent years, the basic ideas of trust and reputation have been applied to WSNs to monitor the changing behaviors of nodes in a network. Several trust and reputation monitoring (TRM) systems have been proposed, to integrate the concepts of trust in networks as an additional security measure, and various surveys are conducted on the aforementioned system. However, the existing surveys lack a comprehensive discussion on trust application specific to the WSNs. This survey attempts to provide a thorough understanding of trust and reputation as well as their applications in the context of WSNs. The survey discusses the components required to build a TRM and the trust computation phases explained with a study of various security attacks. The study investigates the recent advances in TRMs and includes a concise comparison of various TRMs. Finally, a discussion on open issues and challenges in the implementation of trust-based systems is also presented.

show abstract

Trust opportunistic routing protocol in multi-hop wireless networks

Cited by 9 publications

References 17 publications

Opportunistic routing metrics: A timely one-stop tutorial survey

Opportunistic routing metrics: A timely one-stop tutorial survey

Based on Time-Delay and Bandwidth Relay Selection Algorithm for Radio and Television Services

Comparative study of trust and reputation systems for wireless sensor networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About