2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.03.1076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tu1932 AUTOMATED INSERTION TIME, CECAL INTUBATION, AND WITHDRAWAL TIME DURING LIVE COLONOSCOPY USING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS - A VIDEO VALIDATION STUDY

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a proprietary algorithm developed by Docbot that reliably identifies the cecum, 17 we identified 411 videos as showing a cecum (subsequently called colonoscopy) and 384 procedures that did not show a cecum (subsequently called sigmoidoscopy). Although the RNN model was trained to generalize in its predictions of endoscopic severity scores for both sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy procedure types, one of our objectives in this study was to measure the influence of the procedure type on the model's performance.…”
Section: Significance Of Procedures Types To Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a proprietary algorithm developed by Docbot that reliably identifies the cecum, 17 we identified 411 videos as showing a cecum (subsequently called colonoscopy) and 384 procedures that did not show a cecum (subsequently called sigmoidoscopy). Although the RNN model was trained to generalize in its predictions of endoscopic severity scores for both sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy procedure types, one of our objectives in this study was to measure the influence of the procedure type on the model's performance.…”
Section: Significance Of Procedures Types To Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Piloting of CNN-automated procedure labelling such as colonic intubation time, caecal recognition and withdrawal time on video-recorded colonoscopy illustrates high accuracy when compared with manual recording ( R 2 = 0.995). 88…”
Section: Quality Of Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%