2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor volume changes on serial imaging with megavoltage CT for non–small-cell lung cancer during intensity-modulated radiotherapy: How reliable, consistent, and meaningful is the effect?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
86
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
86
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The GTV changes noted by Kupelian et al (10) are greater than the results reported here (22). However, our study shows greater marginal response and less stable disease than the study by Siker et al (11). In part, this is because complete data from Siker et al (11) include a mixture of treatment strategies: patients treated palliatively and with extracranial stereotactic radioablation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The GTV changes noted by Kupelian et al (10) are greater than the results reported here (22). However, our study shows greater marginal response and less stable disease than the study by Siker et al (11). In part, this is because complete data from Siker et al (11) include a mixture of treatment strategies: patients treated palliatively and with extracranial stereotactic radioablation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…However, our study shows greater marginal response and less stable disease than the study by Siker et al (11). In part, this is because complete data from Siker et al (11) include a mixture of treatment strategies: patients treated palliatively and with extracranial stereotactic radioablation. Our study included only patients treated with conventional definitive treatment (see Table 1), and when the palliative and extracranial stereotactic radioablation patient groups are excluded from the data from Siker et al (11), there is better agreement with our study (see Siker* column in Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results of tumor repression have been observed by Guckenberger et al who reported a continuous tumor regression by 1.2% per day 7 . In contrast, Siker et al reported no clinically significant tumor regression in their series; however they used hypofractionated irradiation in their study 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These images are used to provide image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) imaging the target volume to allow adjustment of the patient to optimize treatment. These images potentially includes information about treatment response [2], [3]. But the quantity (up to 30 fractions per patient) of these images makes manual contouring of gross tumor volume (GTV) unfeasible for clinics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%