2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2004.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tungsten mesh as positron transmission moderator in a monoenergetic positron beam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same authors found selfabsorption to be negligible for a NEN source of 10 mCi initial activity. (1985), Brusa et al (1992), and Weng et al (2004) for the unetched foil are, within the scatter of the data, not inconsistent but, as all other previous experimental determinations, they should be considered underestimates since not all the efficiencies discussed in Section II may have been accounted for in these works.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The same authors found selfabsorption to be negligible for a NEN source of 10 mCi initial activity. (1985), Brusa et al (1992), and Weng et al (2004) for the unetched foil are, within the scatter of the data, not inconsistent but, as all other previous experimental determinations, they should be considered underestimates since not all the efficiencies discussed in Section II may have been accounted for in these works.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…To test the hypothesis that the moderation efficiency could be increased by using meshes with thinner diameter wires, an etching procedure was devised similar to the one used by Weng et al (2004). The mesh (Swallow Metals: 99.99% purity; wire diameter, d ¼ 25 lm; transmission coefficient, t ¼ 81%) was cut into 15 mm diameter circular disks and placed into a sodium hypochlorite solution; d was reduced to $19 lm (t $ 86% transmission) in approximately 20 min at 75 C. The reduction in d was calculated by measuring the mass (m), before (b) and after (a) etching using…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…15 The efficiency (η ++ = slow e + /fast e + ) of these moderators is reported in the range of ∼ 10 −4 − 10 −3 . 28,29 On the other hand, the η ++ of a solid Ne moderator is more than an order of magnitude higher, in the range of ∼ 7 × 10 −3 − 1.4 × 10 −2 with positrons emitted from a 22 Na positron emitter. 30,31 Solid Ne provides much higher efficiency than metallic moderators due to the fact that positron diffusion length (L + ) inside a RGM is much longer than it is inside a metallic moderator, and therefore thermalized positrons may diffuse back to the surface with higher probability before they annihilate inside the material.…”
Section: The Challenges and The Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%