1981
DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.xviii.2.169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunnel Boring Machine Performance as a Function of Local Geology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, encountering ground conditions different from the TBM's working envelope, affect the achieved tunnelling rate [21] and can give rise to claims. Thus, the model considers the geological setting to be the most dominant factor for the TBM performance, as many researchers have also noted [22,8,10], and all possible problems and downtime are a direct effect of the geotechnical conditions. The selection of the parameters used in the model was made having in mind their capability to credibly represent the ground behaviour, hydrogeological environment and site-specific conditions [23].…”
Section: Case Study 2 -Athens Metro Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, encountering ground conditions different from the TBM's working envelope, affect the achieved tunnelling rate [21] and can give rise to claims. Thus, the model considers the geological setting to be the most dominant factor for the TBM performance, as many researchers have also noted [22,8,10], and all possible problems and downtime are a direct effect of the geotechnical conditions. The selection of the parameters used in the model was made having in mind their capability to credibly represent the ground behaviour, hydrogeological environment and site-specific conditions [23].…”
Section: Case Study 2 -Athens Metro Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%