Turning points in tourism’s development: 1946-2095, a perspective article

Abstract

Purpose This paper sets out to identify when, how and why tourism has changed from 1946 to 2020 using historical and future turning points. Design/methodology/approach Using the evolutionary paradigm from future studies and the authors’ expertise, this paper aims to provide a focussed review of the history of tourism to identify turning points drawing upon examples from Tourism Review that have transformed or will be of significance in the evolution of tourism. Findings This paper identifies three historical turning points which are mobility, Fordism and mass tourism and a modern-day leisure class. Three future turning points are identified including the political importance of tourism, footprint and transformational technologies. Originality/value By undertaking a historical analysis of the tourism literature, we can determine that Hobsbawm’s (1995, p. 46) proposition that “the future is a replication of the past” is true, as many of the debates about tourism from the past are relevant today and will be in the future. Thus, this paper identifies six turning points that are of significance to historians and futurists in understanding the evolution of tourism from 1946 to 2095.

Real time response (RTR): Conceptualizing a smart systems approach to destination resilience

“…These cross-boundary interactions offer substantial potential to employ new technologies to strengthen and sustain them (Polese et al, 2018). While physical boundaries exist, advances in technology present ongoing opportunities to fortify those weak interactions and foster the implementation of a smarter approach in the face of unprecedented crisis (Buhalis & Amaranggana, 2013;Yang et al, 2017;Yeoman & McMahon-Beattie, 2019). This thinking supports Smart Destinations in the RTR Framework (Buhalis and Amaranggana (2013) and Gretzel, Sigala, et al (2015).…”

Metaverse and Tourism: From a New Niche to a Transformation

“…Historically, social, economic, political, and other factors have already triggered the stages of its development. They have also changed the understanding of who a traveller is, what can be the purpose of travel, and its possible effects on sustainable development [26,30]. The complexity of the tourism phenomenon and its dimensions determine its adaptiveness [15].…”

“…The complexity of the tourism phenomenon and its dimensions determine its adaptiveness [15]. Tourism footprints, political importance, and transformational technologies are forecasted to trigger future turning points in tourism development [30]. The 4th Technological Revolution made completely new forms of tourism and leisure activities possible.…”

Knowledge Mapping of Tourism Footprint: A Bibliometric Review Based on CiteSpace

“…Hunter (2002) defines the tourism ecological footprint and explores its potential for application in tourism sustainability research. Since then, more and more scholars study the term “tourism footprint” (Li & Weng, 2016; Lin et al, 2018; Yeoman & McMahon-Beattie, 2020).…”

“…Academics and governments still need to pay attention to the environmental impact of tourism development (Osorio et al, 2023). Tourism footprint is an effective approach for quantifying tourism’s environmental impact (Wang et al, 2017; Yeoman & McMahon-Beattie, 2020). Systematically describing the knowledge base of tourism footprint research, application fields, and the future development space of tourism footprint through visualization is an important way to actively promote tourism development and enrich the scope of tourism footprint research.…”