2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1802918115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twin-Win Model: A human-centered approach to research success

Abstract: A 70-year-old simmering debate has erupted into vigorous battles over the most effective ways to conduct research. Well-established beliefs are being forcefully challenged by advocates of new research models. While there can be no final resolution to this battle, this paper offers the Twin-Win Model to guide teams of researchers, academic leaders, business managers, and government funding policymakers. The Twin-Win Model favors a problem-oriented approach to research, which encourages formation of teams to pur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shneiderman (28) discusses an approach to creatively rethinking universities' research success models. His focus on combining basic and applied research would likely enable significantly decreased costs of securing research funding.…”
Section: Model Projections and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shneiderman (28) discusses an approach to creatively rethinking universities' research success models. His focus on combining basic and applied research would likely enable significantly decreased costs of securing research funding.…”
Section: Model Projections and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIBAR research projects have a broader range in this spectrum and they are approximately centered within it. This characteristic is conducive to the aforementioned recursive flow of ideas that generates impactful breakthroughs [17].…”
Section: Aspects Of Integration Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another successfull field of research investigates the scientific careers. Shneiderman discusses in details the best strategies for producing highly successful scientific researches balancing between the exploration of new ideas and the exploitation of established works [5]. Ma et al [6] and Sinatra et al [7] both focus on the individual impact of scientists, the former by analyzing the collaboration network of scientific-prize-winners, the latter focusing on the evaluation of the activity of scientists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%