2014
DOI: 10.3109/0142159x.2014.993371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twitter as a tool for communication and knowledge exchange in academic medicine: A guide for skeptics and novices

Abstract: Twitter is a tool for physicians to increase engagement of learners and the public, share scientific information, crowdsource new ideas, conduct, discuss and challenge emerging research, pursue professional development and continuing medical education, expand networks around specialized topics and provide moral support to colleagues. However, new users or skeptics may well be wary of its potential pitfalls. The aims of this commentary are to discuss the potential advantages of the Twitter platform for dialogue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
208
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
208
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in line with the Twitter participation of urological journals (24.2%). 16 However, the uptake of Twitter among physicians is on the rise, 19 a trend that will hopefully extend to medical journals. Rather than identifying large numbers of Science Kardashians, the present study shows that many more journals are closer to "Popularity Franklins" -they have received disproportionately low levels of recognition and popularity than would be warranted by their scientific merit, as per Rosalind Franklin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in line with the Twitter participation of urological journals (24.2%). 16 However, the uptake of Twitter among physicians is on the rise, 19 a trend that will hopefully extend to medical journals. Rather than identifying large numbers of Science Kardashians, the present study shows that many more journals are closer to "Popularity Franklins" -they have received disproportionately low levels of recognition and popularity than would be warranted by their scientific merit, as per Rosalind Franklin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other practical and valuable ways of contributing to FOAM resources include participating in the peer review of content, reporting errors in blogs or podcasts to authors, commenting and engaging in a debate, and participating in discussions by joining in Tweet chats 27 and online journal clubs 28 (e.g., #JGMEScholar 29 and #ALiEMJC 30 ).…”
Section: Strategy Four: Participate By Contributing and Producingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, there is at least one such instance has led to a subsequent work of scholarship. 27 Another way to beta test an idea would be to write blog post sharing your early work on an educational intervention so that you may share these ideas openly with colleagues. Venues where you might submit an early report of an interesting educational idea include ALiEM.com's Ideas in Didactics and Educational Activities series or CanadiEM.org's Featured Education Innovations series.…”
Section: Go For Multiple Winsmentioning
confidence: 99%