2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-event lode-ore deposition at Butte, USA: 40Ar/39Ar and U-Pb documentation of Ag-Au-polymetallic lodes overprinted by younger stockwork Cu-Mo ores and penecontemporaneous Cu lodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that model, heterogeneity in the thickness of sandstones within the Lower clastic member was used to infer tectonic partitioning into distinct subbasins during early growth of low-magnitude, intraforeland basement arches, and doming above igneous intrusive rocks. However, geochronological work on the Boulder batholith and smaller associated stocks in southwestern Montana reveal a dominant age cluster around ∼70-75 Ma (Lund et al, 2002(Lund et al, , 2018, which suggests that local igneous doming is much younger than previously inferred by this depositional model. Alternative interpretations for thickness variations are that the strata were deposited atop a dissected pre-Cretaceous surface with notable relief and subtle local topographic highs (Dolson & Piombino, 1994) or an irregular flexural forebulge (Carrapa et al, 2019;DeCelles & Giles, 1996;Fuentes et al, 2011).…”
Section: Kootenai Formationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In that model, heterogeneity in the thickness of sandstones within the Lower clastic member was used to infer tectonic partitioning into distinct subbasins during early growth of low-magnitude, intraforeland basement arches, and doming above igneous intrusive rocks. However, geochronological work on the Boulder batholith and smaller associated stocks in southwestern Montana reveal a dominant age cluster around ∼70-75 Ma (Lund et al, 2002(Lund et al, , 2018, which suggests that local igneous doming is much younger than previously inferred by this depositional model. Alternative interpretations for thickness variations are that the strata were deposited atop a dissected pre-Cretaceous surface with notable relief and subtle local topographic highs (Dolson & Piombino, 1994) or an irregular flexural forebulge (Carrapa et al, 2019;DeCelles & Giles, 1996;Fuentes et al, 2011).…”
Section: Kootenai Formationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…To the south of Butte is Archean crystalline basement. Stockwork porphyry mineralization occurred at ~ 66-64 Ma likely related to dike emplacement (Lund et al 2002(Lund et al , 2018Dilles et al 2003).…”
Section: Porphyry Cu-mo-au Depositsmagmatic-hydrothermalmentioning
confidence: 99%