2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.10.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type 1 and Type 2 5α-Reductase Expression in the Development and Progression of Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
80
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
80
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several reports have ascribed the phenomenon to bias in tissue sampling, uncertainty in the reproducibility of histological diagnosis, and increased PSA sensitivity, the main concern is the molecular profile of AR and the associated signaling pathway (25)(26)(27). In this study, 5ARI had been proven to be able to change the expression profile of AR and other oncogenic factors such as HOXB13.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Although several reports have ascribed the phenomenon to bias in tissue sampling, uncertainty in the reproducibility of histological diagnosis, and increased PSA sensitivity, the main concern is the molecular profile of AR and the associated signaling pathway (25)(26)(27). In this study, 5ARI had been proven to be able to change the expression profile of AR and other oncogenic factors such as HOXB13.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…6 However, more recently, 5-AR1 expression has also been shown to be increased in prostate cancer compared with normal and BPH tissue at both the messenger RNA (mRNA) level 10,11 and at the protein level. 10,12 Thomas and colleagues provide a review of this data.…”
Section: -Ars and Prostate Cancer Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with testosterone, DHT has a greater binding affinity for the androgen receptor and results in 2-to 10-fold greater translational activity. 10 Finasteride-induced reductions in DHT concentrations result in decreased activation of the androgen receptor, decreased prostate volume, and increased prostatic cell apoptosis. 11 In the PCPT, 18 882 men were randomized to receive either finasteride or placebo over a 9-year period.…”
Section: Primary Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although type 2 is the predominant form in the prostate, type 1 potentially has a more substantial function in the development of prostate cancer than was earlier thought. 10,[33][34][35] As dutasteride inhibits both isoforms, it results in greater reductions in serum and intraprostatic DHT levels than finasteride. [36][37][38][39] REDUCE was a 4-year, multi-institutional, RCT of 0.5 mg daily oral dutasteride versus placebo in 8000 men.…”
Section: Primary Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%