2021
DOI: 10.1080/2154896x.2021.1911045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U.S. Arctic security strategies: balancing strategic and operational dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As of today, Alaska is vital to the US on several fronts, none of which concerns the Arctic; the forty-ninth state looks toward the Pacific rather than toward the Arctic Ocean, and south of its borders rather than north 65 . Moreover, the American approach to the Arctic is mostly geostrategically focused, to the exclusion of operational and tactical considerations 66 . The challenges presented by an increasing Chinese activism in the region 67 or by a shared maritime border with Russia in the Bering Strait, an emerging maritime chokepoint 68 , cannot be overlooked.…”
Section: The Arctic Fivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of today, Alaska is vital to the US on several fronts, none of which concerns the Arctic; the forty-ninth state looks toward the Pacific rather than toward the Arctic Ocean, and south of its borders rather than north 65 . Moreover, the American approach to the Arctic is mostly geostrategically focused, to the exclusion of operational and tactical considerations 66 . The challenges presented by an increasing Chinese activism in the region 67 or by a shared maritime border with Russia in the Bering Strait, an emerging maritime chokepoint 68 , cannot be overlooked.…”
Section: The Arctic Fivementioning
confidence: 99%