Ulnar impaction syndrome: A case series and imaging approach

Liebenberg, C.; Velleman, Mark D.; Suleman, Farhana Ebrahim

doi:10.17159/2309-8309/2016/v15n2a2

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Different anatomical areas of the wrist may be affected by osteoarthritis; the radiocarpal, the distal radioulnar, the ulnocarpal, the midcarpal (including the scaphotrapeziotrapzoid (STT)) and the pisotriquetral joint 6 . Further complexity is added by the variety of terms used to describe ulnocarpal osteoarthritis, such as ulnocarpal abutment and ulnocarpal impaction syndrome, while tears and/or degeneration of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) are intimately involved in ulnocarpal osteoarthritis and distal radioulnar joint synovitis 7 . Osteoarthritis of the wrist may also occur after trauma, such as scaphoid non-union advanced collapse (SNAC), while the pattern of osteoarthritis seen in scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) may be post-traumatic or degenerative 8 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Therapeutic interventions for osteoarthritis of the wrist: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: In order to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for osteoarthritis of the wrist in adults we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: The MEDLINE and EMBASE via OVID, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus via EBSCO databases were searched from inception to 25 th April 2018.All randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and any prospective studies of adults with wrist osteoarthritis investigating any intervention with a comparator were included. Data were extracted and checked for accuracy and completeness by pairs of reviewers. Primary outcomes were pain and function. Comparative treatment effects were analysed by random effects at all time points. Results: Three RCTs were identified for inclusion after screening and all had a high risk of bias. Two compared proximal row carpectomy (PRC) with four corner fusion (4CF) for post-traumatic osteoarthritis, while the other compared leather with commercial wrist splints in patients with chronic wrist pain, of which a small group had wrist osteoarthritis. Conclusion: There is no prospective study comparing operative to non-operative treatment for wrist osteoarthritis, while there is a paucity of prospective studies assessing the effectiveness of both non-operative and operative interventions. Further research is necessary in order to better define which patients benefit from which specific interventions. Registration: The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42018094799.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Therapeutic interventions for osteoarthritis of the wrist: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Therapeutic interventions for osteoarthritis of the wrist: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for Background: osteoarthritis of the wrist in adults we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis.The MEDLINE and EMBASE via OVID, CINAHL and Methods: SPORTDiscus via EBSCO databases were searched from inception to 25 April 2018.All randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and any prospective studies of adults with wrist osteoarthritis investigating any intervention with a comparator were included. Data were extracted and checked for accuracy and completeness by pairs of reviewers. Primary outcomes were pain and function. Comparative treatment effects were analysed by random effects at all time points.Three RCTs were identified for inclusion after screening and all Results: had a high risk of bias. Two compared proximal row carpectomy (PRC) with four corner fusion (4CF) for post-traumatic osteoarthritis, while the other compared leather with commercial wrist splints in patients with chronic wrist pain, of which a small group had wrist osteoarthritis.There is no prospective study comparing operative to Conclusion: non-operative treatment for wrist osteoarthritis, while there is a paucity of prospective studies assessing the effectiveness of both non-operative and operative interventions. Further research is necessary in order to better define which patients benefit from which specific interventions.The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO under Registration: the registration number . CRD42018094799

show abstract

Ulnar impaction syndrome: A case series and imaging approach

Cited by 2 publications

References 18 publications

Therapeutic interventions for osteoarthritis of the wrist: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Therapeutic interventions for osteoarthritis of the wrist: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Therapeutic interventions for osteoarthritis of the wrist: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About