2020
DOI: 10.3390/electronics9061019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-Low-Voltage Inverter-Based Amplifier with Novel Common-Mode Stabilization Loop

Abstract: This work presents a single-stage, inverter-based, pseudo-differential amplifier that can work with ultra-low supply voltages. A novel common-mode stabilization loop allows proper differential operations, without impacting over the output differential performance. Electrical simulations show the effectiveness of this amplifier for supply voltages in the range of 0.3–0.5 V. In particular, a dc voltage gain of 25.16 dB, a gain-bandwidth product of 131.9 kHz with a capacitive load of 10 pF, and a static current c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 summarizes the proposed OTA results and compares them to the state-of-art counterparts. The state-of-art OTAs can be categorized by the input terminal of their first stage amplifier block, and can be gate-driven [19,21,24,[27][28][29][30][31] and bulk-driven [18,28,[32][33][34]. Gate-driven OTAs are usually more power-efficient, as the bulk-drain transconductance is a fraction of the gate-drain transconductance, while bulk-driven OTAs have an extended voltage input range, which leads to less signal distortion for larger voltage signal amplitudes.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 summarizes the proposed OTA results and compares them to the state-of-art counterparts. The state-of-art OTAs can be categorized by the input terminal of their first stage amplifier block, and can be gate-driven [19,21,24,[27][28][29][30][31] and bulk-driven [18,28,[32][33][34]. Gate-driven OTAs are usually more power-efficient, as the bulk-drain transconductance is a fraction of the gate-drain transconductance, while bulk-driven OTAs have an extended voltage input range, which leads to less signal distortion for larger voltage signal amplitudes.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OTA reported in [20] operates with a supply voltage of 1 V and exhibits state of the art small-signal and large-signal figures of merit. Unfortunately, most of these conventional amplifier topologies are not suited for applications requiring supply voltages lower than 0.5 V, and inverter-based [21][22][23][24][25][26] and pseudo-differential [27,28] architectures are preferred. However, an aggressive supply voltage scaling severely limits the swing of the control voltage, thus strongly limiting the effectiveness of body bias approaches to set the bias or the common mode current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this ultra-constrained scenario several high performance OTAs which exploit body-driven gate-biased architectures have been presented in the recent literature [3]- [5]. In detail, the usage of the body-driven approach has resulted in a plenty of topologies which exhibit state-of-the-art performances, both in terms of small signal and large signal figures of merit, and good robustness with respect to process, supply voltage and temperature (PVT) variations [3], [6], [7]. However, such OTAs have to be designed and routed manually and very often result in huge area occupation, due to the fact that separate wells are mandatory to implement body-driven architectures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%