Isolated Be2 is a typical example of a weakly bound system, but interaction with other systems may give rise to surprising bonding features. The interactions between Be2 and a set of selected neutral CnHn (n=2–8) π‐systems have been analyzed through the use of G4 and G4MP2 ab initio methods, along with multireference CASPT2//CASPT2 calculations. Our results systematically show that the CnHn−Be2−CnHn clusters formed are always very stable. However, the nature of this interaction is completely different when the π‐system involved is a closed shell species (n=2, 4, 6, 8), or a radical (n=3, 5, 7). In the first case, the interaction does not occur with the π‐system as a whole, but with specific C centers yielding rather polar but strong C−Be bonds. Nonetheless, although the Be−Be distances in these complexes are similar to the ones in compounds with ultra‐strong Be−Be bonds, a close examination of their electron density distribution reveals that no Be−Be bonds exist. The situation is totally different when the interaction involves two π‐radicals, CnHn−Be2−CnHn (n=3, 5, 7). In these cases, a strong Be−Be bond is formed. Indeed, even though Be is electron deficient, the Be2 moiety behaves as an efficient electron donor towards the two π‐radicals, so that the different CnHn−Be2−CnHn (n=3, 5, 7) clusters are the result of the interaction between Be22+ and two L− anions. The characteristics of these two scenarios do not change when dealing with bicyclic π‐compounds, such as naphthalene and pentalene, because the interaction with the Be2 moiety is localized on one of the unsaturated cycles, the other being almost a spectator.