2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrafiltration membranes modified by PSS deposition and plasma treatment for Cr(VI) removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower active layer resistance for HFM-183+PSS+Ar agrees with the lower zeta potential (lower negative charge), as shown elsewhere [10] (see Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The lower active layer resistance for HFM-183+PSS+Ar agrees with the lower zeta potential (lower negative charge), as shown elsewhere [10] (see Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The membranes were modified using a technique previously reported by us [10]. First, HFM-183 discs of a diameter of 50 mm were washed and 50 mL of a 20.8 g·L −1 aqueous solution of PSS was filtered immediately under a pressure of 8 bar.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These methods include electrochemical methods, membrane ltration, ion exchange, chemical reduction/precipitation and adsorption. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] However, their application on a large scale faces many drawbacks such as high cost, complexity, low efficiency and sludge generation. 9 On the other hand, owing to the simple procedure, cost-effectiveness, high efficiency, sludge free operation, potential for regeneration and environmental friendliness, the adsorption method has a great potential for the removal of Cr(VI), and thus has been attracting increasing attention in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%