2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-013-1491-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrashort pulsed laser conditioning of human enamel: in vitro study of the influence of geometrical processing parameters on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets

Abstract: The surfaces of 63 extracted premolar teeth were processed with intense ultrashort laser pulses (λ = 795 nm; pulse duration, 120 fs; repetition rate, 1 kHz) to produce cross patterns with different pitches (s) in the micrometer range in order to evaluate the influence of such microstructures on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to enamel. The samples were classified in nine groups corresponding to the control group (raw samples) and eight different laser-processed groups (cross patterns with s i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in the APA25 group, alumina particle sandblasting created a rough surface ( Figure 1D), but the surface irregularities had insufficient micro depth and therefore both groups exerted less mechanical retention than the FS group ( Figure 1H) and TSC group ( Figure 1F). In recent studies 27,28 an abrasion pattern similar to that obtained in our study when applying femtosecond laser on the enamel surface, also showing increased adhesive efficiency, has been reported. The use of a femtosecond laser may be valid for conditioning enamel and zirconia surfaces, as we showed here.…”
Section: The Values Obtained In Sbs Test (The Mean Values and Standarsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, in the APA25 group, alumina particle sandblasting created a rough surface ( Figure 1D), but the surface irregularities had insufficient micro depth and therefore both groups exerted less mechanical retention than the FS group ( Figure 1H) and TSC group ( Figure 1F). In recent studies 27,28 an abrasion pattern similar to that obtained in our study when applying femtosecond laser on the enamel surface, also showing increased adhesive efficiency, has been reported. The use of a femtosecond laser may be valid for conditioning enamel and zirconia surfaces, as we showed here.…”
Section: The Values Obtained In Sbs Test (The Mean Values and Standarsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The use of a femtosecond laser may be valid for conditioning enamel and zirconia surfaces, as we showed here. Thus, the irradiation with femtosecond lasers is increasingly supported as an alternative in the field of adhesion in dentistry, replacing drills in conservative dentistry 33 and also serving as both a conditioning agent and for the ablation of different types of surfaces -whether they are biological, such as the enamel 27,28 or dentine, 34 or non-biological, such as porcelain 29 or zirconia, as in the present case-with a minimum amount of thermal and mechanical damage to the surfaces. 35,36 The TSC group had SBS values close to those of the FS group.…”
Section: The Values Obtained In Sbs Test (The Mean Values and Standarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ultrashort-pulse laser systems are not suitable for direct clinical use; however, many studies have reported on the bond strength of dental tissues subjected to treatments using a UPLS. 26,[37][38][39] Lorenzo et al 26 reported stronger bonding of brackets to enamel treated with a UPLS rather than other laser systems. The ablation from UPLS's is induced by a plasma, which imparts less thermal damage than do the longer pulses of ER:YAG lasers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation of enamel surface roughness showed that laser irradiation yielded a comparable or smaller amount of surface roughness than acid etching (Hess 1990, Arcoria et al 1993. With regard to bond strengths of restorative materials, some studies indicated that acid-etched teeth had significantly more bond strength than laser-Laser_etch teeth (Ariyaratnam et al 1997), whereas other demonstrated that laser etching (Melendez et al 1992, Walsh et al 1994, Shahabi et al 2014,Lorenzo et al 2015. These variations could be attributed to the different types of lasers or different irradiation parameters used because the laser-hard tissue interaction is dependent on wavelength and irradiation energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%