2020
DOI: 10.1177/0170840620937892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Un)Sustainability and Organization Studies: Towards a Radical Engagement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
136
0
10

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
6
136
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a similar discrepancy in mainstream OMS research (and teaching) that reinforces the idea that corporations need to keep growing without regard to planetary boundaries or socio-ecological system needs (Ergene et al, 2020;Nyberg and Wright, 2020). This discrepancy is not limited to research.…”
Section: Imagining Post-growth Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a similar discrepancy in mainstream OMS research (and teaching) that reinforces the idea that corporations need to keep growing without regard to planetary boundaries or socio-ecological system needs (Ergene et al, 2020;Nyberg and Wright, 2020). This discrepancy is not limited to research.…”
Section: Imagining Post-growth Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Ecological economics, for example, challenges the orthodoxy of mainstream economics by focusing on human wellbeing, strong sustainability, and economic and ecological justice. Sustainability research in OMS on the other hand is more about corporate sustainability and making a business case for sustainability rather than an ecological case for business (Ergene et al, 2020). There is a need to understand the taken-for-granted assumptions in OMS theories that normalize and reinforce growth.…”
Section: Planetary Crises and Post-growth Organizing: A Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these disciplines, both approaches coexist and continue to stimulate each other (see Farjoun, 2010). This transition should also prove viable and fruitful for SCM by activating more critical, relational, interdisciplinary, and engaged scholarship (Ergene et al, 2020). Second, we should not forget that pioneering work in SCM research has already used dynamic approaches.…”
Section: Moving Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We join those who construct counter-stories to reshuffle prevailing frames of ecopreneurshp (Campbell, 2006); provide alternative understandings of human relationship with nonhuman nature (Beacham, 2018); and look for the micro-revolutions at the micro-level of economic organizing in the Anthropocene realities (Gibson-Graham, 2014). As we attempt in this study, researchers can take a more active part in enacting alternative imaginaries through their work (Ergene et al, 2020;Gayá and Phillips, 2016).…”
Section: Messy Realities Of Alternative Ecopreneursmentioning
confidence: 99%