Uncertainty and probability in neonatal end-of-life decision-making: A mixed method study analysing conversations with families of critically ill newborns

Abstract

Background: A significant number of critically ill neonates face potentially adverse prognoses and fulfil the criteria for perinatal palliative care. When counselling parents about the critical health condition of their child, neonatal healthcare professionals require extensive skills and competencies in palliative care and communication. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the communication patterns and contents between neonatal healthcare professionals and parents of neonates with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions regarding treatment options such as curative and palliative care in the decision-making process. Methods: A mixed methods research design was employed with a qualitative and quantitative approach to analysing audio-recorded conversations between neonatal team and parents.Eight critically ill neonates and a total of 16 conversations from two Swiss level III neonatal intensive care units were included. Results:Three main themes were identified: the weight of uncertainty in diagnosis and prognosis, the decision-making process, and palliative care. Uncertainty was observed to impede the discussion about all options of care, including palliative care. Regarding decision-making, neonatologists oftentimes conveyed to parents that this was a shared endeavour. However, parental preferences were not ascertained in the conversations analysed. In most cases, healthcare professionals were leading the discussion and parents expressed their opinion reactively to the information or options received. Only few couples proactively participated in decision-making. With regards to palliative care, oftentimes the continuation of therapy was the preferred course of action of the healthcare team and the option of palliative care was not mentioned. However, once the option for palliative care was raised, the parents' wishes and needs regarding the end-of-life care of their child were obtained, respected, and implemented by the team. Conclusion: Although shared decision-making was a familiar concept in Swiss neonatal intensive care units, parental involvement in the decision-making process illustrated a somewhat different and complex picture. Strict adherence to the concept of certainty might impede the process of decision-making, thereby not discussing palliation and missing opportunities to include parental values and preferences.