Uncertainty of the implementation time of geodynamic monitoring system in multi-criteria ranking of alternatives

Abstract

<p>The paper deals with the problem of ranking alternatives to geodynamic monitoring systems in the case of uncertainty of their implementation time. The problem is characterized by the fact that the choice of alternatives and the effect of it depends on the quality properties of the applied organizational and technical solutions, taking into account the time of implementation. The ordering of alternatives is proposed taking into account the uncertainty of the implementation time factors. Ranking is realized by comparing the trees of functional characteristics of alternatives taking into account the compliance of their characteristics with time-varying requirements. The scope of the proposed method is the choice of configurations of geodynamic monitoring systems with significant differences in the implementation time of alternatives.</p>

The Multiple Source Control Method for Functional-Structure Modernization of Reconfigurable Infocommunication Environments

“…The problem of selecting suppliers refers to problems of multi-criteria decision making in the presence of several antagonistic factors, and their evaluation is related to problems of multi-criteria assessment. The basic control methods used to manage source of IT components are reduced to: linear weight models, categorical models, weighted point models, full cost of ownership models, neural networks, the main component method, multivariate utility theory [5,6]. To improve evaluation accuracy, integration of various methods of analysis is widely used, in particular, [7] offers integration of interpretive structural modeling (interpretive structural modeling) and analytical networks, Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique [8,9].…”

“…To improve evaluation accuracy, integration of various methods of analysis is widely used, in particular, [7] offers integration of interpretive structural modeling (interpretive structural modeling) and analytical networks, Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique [8,9]. Further development of evaluation methods under uncertainty is associated with analysis of hierarchies and its extensions taking into account the Fuzzy extended analytical hierarchical process (AHP) [10,11] or hybrid approaches to evaluation [6].…”