2017
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2016.2628960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty Quantification in ALS-Based Species-Specific Growing Stock Volume Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same test data as in [13] is used in this study. In this section, the data set is briefly summarized, for detailed description, see e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The same test data as in [13] is used in this study. In this section, the data set is briefly summarized, for detailed description, see e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plot or cell level prediction uncertainty has garnered some research interest in recent years and several methods of predicting plot/cell level variance have been proposed [10]- [12]. Recently, a Bayesian inference approach to quantify uncertainty within the framework of the ABA was proposed by Varvia et al [13]. The main shortcoming in the method proposed in [13] is that it is computationally costly: wall-to-wall uncertainty quantification of a large forest area would require considerable computer resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An additional benefit of these methods is that both Kalman filter and Bayesian techniques, commonly used for data assimilation, provide uncertainty estimates as part of the estimation framework (e.g. Varvia et al 2017). …”
Section: Estimating Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this is the case, then asymptotic unbiasedness is tested by cross-validation methods, such as Leave-One-Out (LOO). Some recent Bayesian studies of forest inventory that have adopted this approach include [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%