Under Pressure: Security and Stability Related Challenges for Liberal Democracy in North-western Europe

Abstract

Liberal democracy in the world is under pressure. This article will specifically look at security and stability related challenges for liberal democracy in a specific region, namely North-western Europe. As will be shown, three distinct security and stability related challenges put pressure on liberal democracy in this region. Firstly, the struggle by states to provide security for their citizens in an era where the blurring of internal and external security leads to "new" security threats. Secondly, the decline of social cohesion in society, causing unrest and instability. Thirdly, the undermining of liberal democracy by the state. As will be shown, these challenges have an impact on the organizations working in the security domain as well, in particular the armed forces and the police. Paradoxically, efforts by governments to counter the security and stability related challenges could eventually lead to a declining stability of liberal democracy.

From peacetime to war: a path analysis of the factors that predict performance among police and military commanders in collaborative crisis response

“…The second debate concerns how pre-existing decision-making frameworks often yield poor organizational performance in situations that are difficult to predict and anticipate (Marchau et al, 2019). Moreover, these issues are amplified by the growing phenomenon of police militarization (Kraska, 2021) and the blurred boundaries between internal and external security in Western countries (van Vark, 2021), as well as the difficulties of applying traditional rules of engagement to hybrid warfare scenarios (Schmitt et al, 2022).…”

Backsliding among indicators of democratic stability relevant to public health: Risks in OECD nations

“…Here, less stable democracies may have incentives for further restriction of public goods for certain groups to concentrate benefits among core supporters, along with tactics to oppress and demobilize pushback against constrained access to these public goods (González, 2020; Lerman & Weaver, 2014; Trounstine, 2008, 2018; Weaver & Prowse, 2020). Tactics of oppression may include heavy or militarized policing (González, 2020); voting restrictions (Helmke et al, 2022); use or promotion of violence by state and nonstate actors (Bartels, 2020; Vark, 2021); or limiting aspects of procedural justice (Hemrajani, 2022; Weaver & Prowse, 2020).…”

The citizen preferences–positive externality trade-off: A survey study of COVID-19 vaccine deployment in Japan

“…Indeed, the COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the global vulnerability of constitutional and inclusive institutions through violations of apparently established institutional norms ( Edgell et al, 2021 ). A sensitive issue involves conflicts between the values of constitutional democracies and the security measures implemented against COVID-19, which is referred to as the security–liberty trade-off ( Koyama, 2021 ; Pennington, 2021 ; Pereira & Stornelli, 2022 ; van Vark, 2021 ), a classical issue dating back to Hayek (2007) ( Hayek, 2007 , p. 155). The issue of whether to allow the tracking of SMS/phone communication to detect infection routes is particularly serious and has created divides both between and within advanced democracies ( Beduschi, 2021 ; Fahey & Hino, 2020 ; Ghose et al, 2022 ; Kawata & Nakabayashi, 2022 ; Tran & Nguyen, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2020 ).…”