2017
DOI: 10.1108/ijopm-05-2016-0263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understand, reduce, respond: project complexity management theory and practice

Abstract: This paper contributes to the understanding of complexity and its management from an OM perspective, building on and extending the systematic literature review published in this journal in 2011, and provides a foundation for exploring the interactions between complexities and responses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
155
1
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
5
155
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although earlier studies that included project complexity, i.e., (Horwitz & Horwitz, 2007), found no significant moderating effect, the concept and measures of complexity have progressed significantly since then. Recent studies on various topics have highlighted the importance of project complexity as a contextual variable (e.g., (Ellinas, Allan & Johansson, 2018;Gao, Chen, Wang & Wang, 2018;Hartono, 2018;Maylor & Turner, 2017). Furthermore, from a social identity standpoint, as mentioned earlier, the impacts of cultural dimensions on diversity also deserve further investigation, as proposed by Roberson et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although earlier studies that included project complexity, i.e., (Horwitz & Horwitz, 2007), found no significant moderating effect, the concept and measures of complexity have progressed significantly since then. Recent studies on various topics have highlighted the importance of project complexity as a contextual variable (e.g., (Ellinas, Allan & Johansson, 2018;Gao, Chen, Wang & Wang, 2018;Hartono, 2018;Maylor & Turner, 2017). Furthermore, from a social identity standpoint, as mentioned earlier, the impacts of cultural dimensions on diversity also deserve further investigation, as proposed by Roberson et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Effective project exploration may result in creative deliberation and flexibility in multiple scenarios for potential solutions, which are especially important in start-up projects. Moreover, studies offer convincing evidence that exploration and flexibility are key success factors in addressing project uncertainty (Hartono, Sulistyo, Chai & Indarti, 2019;Maylor & Turner, 2017;Turner, Maylor & Swart, 2015). In addition, task-related conflicts within start-ups may highlight unique perspectives that relate to the specific needs of new market segments.…”
Section: Task Type Was Another Possible Moderating Variable As Suggementioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,14,40 Complexity, according to system scholars, is associated to multifaceted project attributes which reflect challenges to be encountered by project teams. [41][42][43][44][45][46] The challenges include understanding, designing, analyzing, foreseeing, keeping under control, or managing systems or organizations. 47,48 Recent qualitative studies in project maturity and performance have provided early evidence to support the moderation assertion on PMM models.…”
Section: Project Complexity and The Moderation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Project complexity. Previous works by scholars [44][45][46]86 identified various perspectives pertinent to complexity concepts. Despite variations, many of the reviewed concepts share similar notions that complexity is not only linked to the number of the system's subsystems and components (i.e.…”
Section: Operational Definitions Dimensions and Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many external stakeholders participate in mega projects, including but not limited to investors, contractors, governments and suppliers, which will cause social conflicts as a cause of complexity to be occurred. https://doi.org/10.15405/epms.2019.12.6 Corresponding Author: Mohammad Mohseni Selection and peer-review under & Hertogh, 2018;Callegari, Szklo, & Schaeffer, 2018;Dao et al, 2016;Eriksson et al, 2017;Forozandeh, Ebrahim, & Makui, 2018;Hartono, 2018;He, Luo, Hu, & Chan, 2015;Hu et al, 2015;Abdou et al, 2016;Kuhn, Schaefer, & Otten, 2018;Lessard, Sakhrani, & Miller, 2014;Makui, Zadeh, Bagherpour, & Jabbarzadeh, 2018;Maylor & Turner, 2017;Mikkelsen, 2018;Mirza & Ehsan, 2017;Mok, Shen, & Yang, 2015;Mozaffari, Fazli, & Sedaghat-Seresht, 2012;Nguyen et al, Ambiguity in the domain the dynamics of work activities 5 (Bakhshi et al, 2016;Bjorvatn & Wald 2018;Bosch-Rekveldt et al, 2018;Callegari et al, 2018;Dao et al 2016;Eriksson et al 2017;Forozandeh et al, 2018;Habibi, Barzinpour, & Sadjadi, 2018;Hartono 2018;He et al, 2015;Invernizzi, Locatelli, Gronqvis, & Brookes, 2019;Abdou et al, 2016;Kuhn et al, 2018;Lehtinen, Peltokorpi, & Artto, 2019;…”
Section: Step 3 • Review Journals and Top Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%