2018
DOI: 10.1071/sh18061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and measuring uptake and coverage of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery among adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract: In response to World Health Organization (WHO) guidance recommending oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for all individuals at substantial risk for HIV infection, significant investments are being made to expand access to oral PrEP globally, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Some have interpreted early monitoring reports from new programs delivering oral PrEP to adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) as suggestive of low uptake. However, a lack of common definitions complicates interpretation of oral PrEP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings also corroborate previous evidence which suggests that offering PrEP in a youth-friendly environment may promote AGYW's interest in initiating PrEP [23,24]. Most of our interviews were conducted among participants who were able to receive other sexual and reproductive health services in a youth-friendly environment in the context of Girl Power, and described features of this environment as appealing for PrEP distribution as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our findings also corroborate previous evidence which suggests that offering PrEP in a youth-friendly environment may promote AGYW's interest in initiating PrEP [23,24]. Most of our interviews were conducted among participants who were able to receive other sexual and reproductive health services in a youth-friendly environment in the context of Girl Power, and described features of this environment as appealing for PrEP distribution as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Such tracking could help estimate the number of individuals who may no longer need PrEP or who used other services. This is consistent with the proposed prevention‐effective approach in which individuals may discontinue PrEP when they do not feel at risk owing to adoption of other prevention strategies or changes in their HIV risk [19,20]. In our upcoming qualitative publications, we will provide information on reasons for discontinuation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The impact of PrEP should be assessed by the overall reduction in HIV incidence not just among users but in the broader population. We define coverage as the composite of uptake and persistence with sufficient adherence on PrEP within the target population, functioning then as the link to impact ; critically, high uptake without persistence will not lead to impactful coverage. Like prevalence, coverage can be measured at a given point or over a period of time, though this time period should be reported clearly .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%