2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding care for the poor in rural Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies addressed explicitly the impact of welfare systems on rural poverty (Palacios ; Shubin ; Valero et al ; Black et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A few studies addressed explicitly the impact of welfare systems on rural poverty (Palacios ; Shubin ; Valero et al ; Black et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies addressed explicitly the impact of welfare systems on rural poverty (Palacios 2007;Shubin 2012;Valero et al 2016;Black et al 2019). This is also a theme of the comparative review of research on rural poverty in the USA and UK by Shucksmith and Schafft (2012) and of the TIPSE project exploring territorial impacts of poverty and social exclusion across Europe (Copus et al 2015a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pensioners who have moved to Burla from surrounding villages, where they were employed on one of the district's 6 collective farms, all of which have since collapsed, receive no support.3 See alsoShubin (2012) this issue, for a discussion of contemporary develop-…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, such settlements are highly dependent on the subvention and donation from the regional centres and are often characterised by isolation, both in terms of location and socio-economic development. Many face a significant population loss caused by adverse living conditions and lack of jobs (e.g., Shubin 2012;Bednarikova et al 2016); some even struggle for survival (e.g., Kovalyova 2019). As the Nordic practice shows, building necessary infrastructure, or modernisation of the existing boiler houses and pipeline networks, which would make possible the utilisation of energy wood, may offer the municipalities energy independence, new jobs, and increased revenue to the local economy (e.g., Enonenergia 2020).…”
Section: Opportunities and Challenges Of Reforming The Forestry Sector In Karelia Through The Adoption Of Nordic Forest Solutions (I II Amentioning
confidence: 99%