Understanding Difference to Build Bridges among Stakeholders: Perceptions of Participation in Four Multi-stakeholder Forums in the Peruvian Amazon

Barletti, Juan Pablo Sarmiento; Larson, Anne M.; Vigil, Nicole Heise

doi:10.1080/00220388.2021.1945041

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Given this background, it may be argued that various discourses regarding the roles of MSPs exist. However, in landscape governance literature, discourses about how stakeholders perceive and frame the role of MSPs in addressing landscape challenges have received limited attention (Sarmiento Barletti et al 2022 ). Nevertheless, MSPs are widely promoted as an essential component of integrated landscape approaches (ILAs) that aim to bring stakeholders together to negotiate trade-offs between competing land uses and conservation-development aims (Kusters et al 2020 ; Ratner et al 2022 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Multistakeholder Platforms in Environmental Governance: Analyzing Stakeholder Perceptions in Kalomo District, Zambia, Using Q-Method

Siangulube

2023

Environmental Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multistakeholder platforms (MSPs) are increasingly applied in environmental governance as institutions to collectively negotiate challenges, opportunities, and policy options in contested landscapes. However, their contributions and effectiveness depend on how stakeholders perceive and frame the role of MSPs in addressing social and environmental challenges. Despite this dependence, stakeholder perceptions of MSPs are currently under-researched. Hence this empirical study carried out in Zambia’s Kalomo District asks: how do stakeholder groups perceive the role of MSPs in addressing landscape challenges, given the context of the dual land tenure system, and what does this imply for the implementation of integrated landscape approaches? This study uses Q-methodology to analyze the perceptions of purposefully selected stakeholders from state institutions, civil society organizations, land users, and others familiar with existing MSPs at the district and village levels. The findings reveal three narratives. The first one presents MSPs as institutions that foster dialogue. The second narrative foregrounds the role of the government and private sector, despite acknowledging the diversity of stakeholders in MSPs. In this narrative, MSPs should focus on supporting market-driven solutions to resolve landscape challenges. The third narrative recognizes power imbalances and considers MSPs as institutions to identify policy gaps and needs. The first two narratives are positioned in Dryzek’s discourse classification as environmental problem-solving, while the third inclines toward green radicalism. Despite this divergence, there was consensus that MSPs have the potential to harmonize policies in a dual governance system and encourage dialogue between stakeholders to reconcile landscape challenges.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%