Understanding motives for and barriers to implementing asset management system: an empirical study for engineered physical assets

Maletic, Matjaz; Almeida, N.; Gomišček, Boštjan

doi:10.1080/09537287.2022.2026672

Cited by 38 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The data collection methods included a questionnaire prepared in advance to help respondents to assess the integration of sustainable aspects into asset management activities. Questions were developed based on the previous literature on asset management and sustainability (Crespo Márquez et al, 2020;GFMAM, 2014;Maletič et al, 2018Maletič et al, , 2022Ratnayake, 2013). The final results take into account all available data and may differ from the self-assessment reported in the questionnaire.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Prior research (Maletič et al, 2018) has provided evidence that physical asset management contributes to sustainability performance (in terms of achieving economic, environmental, and social performance). As such, physical assets, namely engineering assets, are important to create value not only for the organization itself but also for a wide range of stakeholders that are external to the organization (Almeida et al, 2021;Maletič et al, 2018;Maletič et al, 2022;Trindade et al, 2019). Optimum realization of value from assets involves a holistic approach and the consideration of complex and often contradictory expectations of different stakeholders, but it provides the organization with important competitive advantages.…”

Section: Javni Sektormentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

41 st International Conference on Organizational Science Development

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Povzetek Trajnostni razvoj je eden izmed ključnih dejavnikov razvoja v zadnjih tridesetih letih na gospodarskem, družbenem in okoljskem področju. V tej raziskavi smo se osredotočili na družbeni vidik trajnostnega razvoja, ki ga obravnava tudi četrti cilj: kakovostno izobraževanje v okviru Združenih narodov. Rezultati ankete pri 203 dijakih so pokazali, da imajo dijaki občutek nizkega znanja o trajnostnem razvoju, saj so se samoocenili s povprečno oceno 2,36 (od maks. 5) in s standardnim odklonom 0,72. Pri pomembnosti trajnostnega razvoja v družbi so dijaki ocenjevali boljše, povprečna ocena je bila 3,78, standardni odklon pa 0,80. Korelacijska analiza kaže na srednjo šibko povezanost med spremenljivkama ocene lastnega znanja in pomembnostjo trajnostnega razvoja. Definicija trajnostnega razvoja ni popolnoma razumljiva pri 48 % dijakov, saj na vprašanje niso odgovorili ali pa so odgovorili napačno. Četrtina (25 %) anketiranih dijakov razume trajnostni razvoj z vidika varovanja okolja, družbeni vidik so prepoznali v 7 %, ekonomski pa le v 2 %. Pri pridobivanju znanja na tem področju so v ospredju mediji in socialna omrežja.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Javni Sektormentioning

confidence: 99%

41 st International Conference on Organizational Science Development

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As experiências de aplicação desta nova abordagem na indústria começaram a ganhar expressão nas décadas seguintes (Maletič et al, 2022). Nos anos 1990, surgiram vários movimentos associativos, conferências regulares, iniciativas comerciais e guias técnicos que ajudaram a consolidar a disciplina da gestão de ativos físicos (Almeida, 2021).…”

Section: Origem E Desenvolvimento Da Gestão De Ativosunclassified

Fundamentos E Perspetivas De Inovação Na Gestão De Ativos De Engenharia

Almeida

2023

RAE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O presente artigo combina os aspetos tradicionais da gestão aplicada a realizações da Arquitetura, Engenharia e Construção (AEC) com os da área transdisciplinar emergente da gestão de ativos. Aborda também o papel da inovação e do empreendedorismo na afirmação da abordagem da gestão de ativos de engenharia com particular incidência no âmbito específico dos ativos construídos. Esta combinação justifica-se pelos crescentes desafios colocados na gestão de empreendimentos de infraestruturas, edifícios e instalações industriais que servem funções críticas para o funcionamento das sociedades. O envelhecimento e a natural degradação da condição deste tipo de sistemas de ativos físicos críticos implicam necessidades elevadas de investimento de renovação e modernização nas próximas décadas, exigindo a mobilização de recursos limitados que podem não estar imediatamente disponíveis. Isto tem atraído atenções para o potencial dos conceitos e princípios da gestão de ativos no domínio da Arquitetura, Engenharia e Construção (AEC) e para a necessária adaptação e inovação da abordagem clássica da gestão da construção e dos empreendimentos de construção para integrar esses mesmos conceitos e princípios.

show abstract

“…While asset availability and reliability become critical issues in capital-intensive operations, the strategic importance of maintenance in such businesses should be recognised (Tsang, 2002). Faced with the challenges of changing business models and increased cost pressures, organisations need to focus on striking a balance between costs and risks and achieving the desired performance (Maletič et al, 2023(Maletič et al, , 2020. With the support of maintenance management, which is a very important part of asset management (AM), companies should realise their full potential and achieve their business goals effectively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Exploration of Organisational Readiness for Industry 4.0: A Predictive Maintenance Perspective

Maletič,

Maletič

2024

QIP Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to examine the extent to which selected Slovenian companies are prepared to integrate the complex requirements of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) into their asset management practices, using the specific example of predictive maintenance. Methodology/Approach: A research study was conducted on a sample of Slovenian manufacturing companies. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire to investigate the extent to which companies are engaged with new technologies and their current and future focus on their use in predictive maintenance. Findings: The analysis of the empirical data shows that companies are aware of the benefits that can be achieved with I4.0 solutions. The results also show that the companies surveyed lack a clear vision and implementation roadmap for I4.0. The results also show that the majority of companies in the sample are still at an early stage of predictive maintenance strategy maturity. Research Limitation/implication: The sample of responding companies is limited to the Slovenian manufacturing industry, and the subjective information comes from only one representative person in each company. Originality/Value of paper: The paper is one of the first studies to highlight digitalisation and predictive maintenance in the context of I4.0.

show abstract

Understanding motives for and barriers to implementing asset management system: an empirical study for engineered physical assets

Cited by 38 publications

References 71 publications

41 st International Conference on Organizational Science Development

41 st International Conference on Organizational Science Development

Fundamentos E Perspetivas De Inovação Na Gestão De Ativos De Engenharia

An Exploration of Organisational Readiness for Industry 4.0: A Predictive Maintenance Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About