2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2020.101491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA): A systematic literature review and directions for further investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…With the development of Web services technology and SOA (Service Oriented Architecture), simulation resources are increasingly deployed and published as Web services in geographic modeling and simulation systems to support sharing and reuse (Wen et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2020;Niknejad et al, 2020), such as eHabitat, a web processing service for ecosystem simulation (Dubois et al, 2013), and AWARE, a water resource monitoring and prediction framework (Granell et al, 2010;Gan et al, 2020). In addition, based on the SOA, for the development of open science (Woelfle et al, 2011;Nosek et al, 2015), different geographers and experts have conducted preliminary explorations on open geographic modeling and simulation research modes, such as SWATShare (Rajib et al, 2016), HydroShare (Bandaragoda et al, 2019;Gan et al, 2020), and OpenGMS (Open Geographic Modeling and Simulation Systems) (Wen et al, 2013;Yue et al, 2015Yue et al, , 2018Yue S S et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2018Wang et al, , 2020Zhang et al, 2019Zhang et al, , 2020Chen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Operational Architecture Analysis Of Geographic Modeling and Simulation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of Web services technology and SOA (Service Oriented Architecture), simulation resources are increasingly deployed and published as Web services in geographic modeling and simulation systems to support sharing and reuse (Wen et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2020;Niknejad et al, 2020), such as eHabitat, a web processing service for ecosystem simulation (Dubois et al, 2013), and AWARE, a water resource monitoring and prediction framework (Granell et al, 2010;Gan et al, 2020). In addition, based on the SOA, for the development of open science (Woelfle et al, 2011;Nosek et al, 2015), different geographers and experts have conducted preliminary explorations on open geographic modeling and simulation research modes, such as SWATShare (Rajib et al, 2016), HydroShare (Bandaragoda et al, 2019;Gan et al, 2020), and OpenGMS (Open Geographic Modeling and Simulation Systems) (Wen et al, 2013;Yue et al, 2015Yue et al, , 2018Yue S S et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2018Wang et al, , 2020Zhang et al, 2019Zhang et al, , 2020Chen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Operational Architecture Analysis Of Geographic Modeling and Simulation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A logical device can be assigned with any compatible physical devices if they satisfy the constraint between devices described using an ontology model. The study by Niknejad et al [11] stated the characteristics of SOA in order to enhance service delivery performance of existing conventional systems while preserving essential features. Many design approaches and patterns adopt SOA because it can be defined as an architectural concept that allows loose coupling, reusability, interoperability, agility, and efficiency.…”
Section: Preliminary 21 Service-oriented-architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current technological landscape, the trend is towards a concentration of functionalities that, depending on the risk, are only accessible to proprietary technological frameworks (SAP, IBM, ORACLE, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, among others). These approaches, which include the concept of micro-services [17], do not convey relevant innovation in the context of a Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) [18], so they are unlikely to promote integrated approaches that support processes in the digital age. There are currently several approaches to perform interoperability tasks between CPS, but these are proprietary systems.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%