Understanding the assistive technology needs of people over 55: The future of mobility aids

Moxham, Lorna; Stutchbury, Tamantha K.; Spinks, Geoffrey M.; Vet, Eliza de; Ikutegbe, Victoria; Traynor, Victoria; Taylor, Leanne; Michielin, Nicole L

doi:10.1111/ajag.12648

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As people age, they commonly encounter a range of health‐related conditions, physiological, cognitive, sensory and psychosocial changes which may influence mobility 3‐7 . Assessments are commonly completed with ACF residents, and those requiring support are supplied with a mobility aid to facilitate independence 4‐6,8 . Additionally, specific environmental features, such as the layout of doorways and corridors, lighting, flooring and handrails, are designed to support ACF users 8‐10 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

What are the perceptions of staff who work in, and professionals who advise on the design of, Australian aged care facilities on the value and use of handrails in corridors?

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To investigate the perceived value of handrails and how they are used in Australian aged care facilities (ACFs). Such information aims to contribute to the body of knowledge available about handrails, their design features and application. Methods This study adopted a descriptive cross‐sectional research design. Online surveys were distributed to members of Australian professional networks, collecting information about handrail use, mobility supports and handrail design in ACFs. Results There were 112 participants (80% female), aged 18‐55 years or older. Many identified that handrails in ACF corridors are used by a residents, staff and visitors, and that circular‐shaped handrails should be installed in ACF corridors to assist with mobility and safety. Conclusion Handrails in ACF corridors offer an alternate support to those who experience an unexpected loss of balance and those without or unable to use a mobility aid, ultimately enabling users’ mobility and assisting staff to carry out work duties.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Assessments are commonly completed with ACF residents, and those requiring support are supplied with a mobility aid to facilitate independence 4‐6,8 . Additionally, specific environmental features, such as the layout of doorways and corridors, lighting, flooring and handrails, are designed to support ACF users 8‐10 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What are the perceptions of staff who work in, and professionals who advise on the design of, Australian aged care facilities on the value and use of handrails in corridors?

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Incidence and dynamics of mobility device use among community‐dwelling older adults in the United States

Liu,

Baumann,

Rosso

et al. 2024

Journal of Elder Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobility devices are crucial in enhancing activities and participation for individuals with mobility disability, particularly among the rapidly expanding population of older adults worldwide. This paper explores patterns of mobility device use among a nationally representative cohort of community‐dwelling older adults in the United States, using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) waves 1–9 (2011–2019). Our descriptive analysis focuses on the characteristics of incident mobility device use, its influencing factors, and related user experiences, aligning with the NHATS late‐life disability framework. Mobility devices were categorized into walking aids (WAs), wheeled and seated mobility devices (WSMDs), and mixed use of both. We identified 2,943 incidents of mobility device use among 2,591 participants, spanning 47,722 person‐years in community settings, yielding an incidence rate of 61.7 per 1,000 person‐years. Over half (51.3%) of mobility device use ended in 1 year, with WAs being the predominantly used (63.8%). About one‐third (30.5%) of these incidents involved a change in device combinations, with a notable shift towards WSMDs and mixed use over time. We found that older adults using WSMDs or changing their device combinations were in a more vulnerable state, while those using mixed devices or changing their device combinations experienced poorer user experiences. This study advocates for the implementation of rental and recycling programs, the involvement of NGOs and professional associations, and the adoption of flexible policies responding to the dynamic patterns of mobility device use among community‐dwelling older adults. It also recommends expanding services to better serve vulnerable subgroups.

show abstract

An Algorithm-Based Approach to Map and Analyze the Impacts of Assistive Technologies on the Systemic Players

de Jesus,

Lourenço,

Nara

et al. 2024

Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding the assistive technology needs of people over 55: The future of mobility aids

Cited by 3 publications

References 24 publications

What are the perceptions of staff who work in, and professionals who advise on the design of, Australian aged care facilities on the value and use of handrails in corridors?

What are the perceptions of staff who work in, and professionals who advise on the design of, Australian aged care facilities on the value and use of handrails in corridors?

Incidence and dynamics of mobility device use among community‐dwelling older adults in the United States

An Algorithm-Based Approach to Map and Analyze the Impacts of Assistive Technologies on the Systemic Players

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About