Understanding the Role of Synthetic Parameters in the Defect Engineering of UiO-66: A Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

UiO-66 is one of the most significant and highly studied metal−organic frameworks to date due to its exceptional thermal and chemical stability and its demonstrated potential in a myriad of applications, such as the purification of contaminated waters, gas storage, and catalysis. Defective UiO-66, where either organic linkers or whole inorganic clusters are missing from the pristine framework structure, is of key interest as the unsaturated Zr sites left by these missed connections lead to enhanced catalytic and adsorptive performance, among other benefits such as increased surface area. A solvothermal approach with the inclusion of modulators is typically employed to synthesize defective UiO-66, but a complete understanding of the links between synthetic parameters and structural outcomes has yet to be reached. This review aims to address this gap by providing a thorough overview of the current literature and a detailed discussion of key aspects of the synthesis of UiO-66 and its resulting defectivity; this literature review is supported by a meta-analysis of representative experimental papers. The focus of the meta-analysis is to draw, where possible, quantitative connections between important synthetic parameters (namely, temperature, time, modulator acidity, and reagent concentration) and the structural features reported in the literature for defective UiO-66 (namely, quantitative defectivity, defect types, surface area, particle size, and pore volume). Despite significant limitations of the meta-analysis data set, we are able to determine some statistically significant relationships between parameters and provide recommendations for essential future experimental work. The research questions not conclusively answered by the meta-analysis are addressed by a thorough examination of individual papers discussing the various influencing factors. From this, we provide recommendations to aid the judicious choice of reagents and other synthetic parameters. Overall, this detailed analysis and review compiles critical experimental findings, provides key insights into optimizing defect formation in UiO-66, and highlights important research gaps in the current literature.

Evaluating the Role of Functional Groups in the Selective Capture of Ag(I) onto UiO-66-Type Metal–Organic Frameworks

“…This confirms the successful synthesis of UiO-66 and its derivatives in the experimental procedure. Notably, both functionalized and pristine UiO-66 demonstrate identical topology, in accordance with existing literature findings. − However, upon careful scrutiny, it becomes apparent that the distinct peak profiles of UiO-66-(SH) 2 and UiO-66-(COOH) 2 exhibit a slightly broader nature when compared to those of other functionalized UiO-66 crystals. This observation implies that lower crystallinity may serve as a contributing factor.…”

The Chemistry of Metal Organic Framework Materials

“…More recently, MOF glasses, a disordered form of MOFs, are finding niche applications. This virtual collection catalogues recent MOF advances featured in Chemistry of Materials from 2022 to 2023, − with an accompanying editorial by Laura Gagliardi and Omar Yaghi that outlines three critical future directions for MOFs …”

“…Likewise, there is profound interest in understanding how the structural features of MOFsdefects, modulators, their dimensionality, host–guest units, donor–acceptor and push–pull modulescan be integrated by design and contribute to properties (see Table ). An in-depth review by McKemmish, Lessio, and co-workers covered the roles of synthetic parameters such as temperature, time, metal/ligand ratio, coordination and protonation modulators, etc., in the defect engineering of UiO-66 …”

From Synthesis Conditions to UiO-66 Properties: Machine Learning Approach

“…While individual studies on synthesis conditions–property relationships typically cover a limited range of conditions, − reviews , and meta-analyses , consolidate data from multiple studies, potentially uncovering empirical patterns and fostering new discoveries. Despite their undoubted benefits, they often fall short of providing quantitative models for property prediction based on synthesis conditions.…”