2014
DOI: 10.1080/08959285.2013.854366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the “Why” as Well as the “How”: Service Performance is a Function of Prosocial Motives and Emotional Labor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
31
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Noor and Zainuddin (2011) found that surface acting was positively associated with emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Additionally, Maneotis, Grandey, and Krauss (2014) revealed a dampening effect related to surface acting, such that surface acting buffers those with low prosocial motives. However, the amplifying effect of deep acting was not observed.…”
Section: Literature Review Emotional Labormentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Noor and Zainuddin (2011) found that surface acting was positively associated with emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Additionally, Maneotis, Grandey, and Krauss (2014) revealed a dampening effect related to surface acting, such that surface acting buffers those with low prosocial motives. However, the amplifying effect of deep acting was not observed.…”
Section: Literature Review Emotional Labormentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Côté, DeCelles, McCarthy, Van Kleef, and Hideg (2011) identified that emotional intelligence can affect prosocial behaviors or interpersonal deviance depending upon the source of motivation (e.g., morality versus Machiavellianism). Additionally, Maneotis, Grandey, and Krauss (2014) explored the "why" and "how" of emotional labor, looking at the intersection of prosocial motives and emotion regulation. Maneotis et al (2014) argued that prosocial motives-motives that drive employees to help others-are likely attributes that employees bring with them to the job.…”
Section: Relations Of Hr Policy Domains With Emotional Labormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Maneotis, Grandey, and Krauss (2014) explored the "why" and "how" of emotional labor, looking at the intersection of prosocial motives and emotion regulation. Maneotis et al (2014) argued that prosocial motives-motives that drive employees to help others-are likely attributes that employees bring with them to the job. This view of motives places them into the category of being a possible emotional labor ability that could be recruited and even trained.…”
Section: Relations Of Hr Policy Domains With Emotional Labormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…w pracy Maneotis i wsp., którzy w swoich analizach odwoły-wali się do motywacji prospołecznej vs finansowej [25]. Również badania nad motywacją do służby publicznej wskazują, że poziom tej motywacji ma znaczenie przy podejmowaniu płytkiej lub głębokiej formy PE [26].…”
Section: Omówienieunclassified
“…Ponadto pracownicy podejmujący płytkie działanie muszą zwodzić klienta poprzez odpowiednią ekspresję uczuć, a to wpływa na obniżoną satysfakcję i brak zaangażowania w pracę, a także może powodować dolegliwości psychosomatyczne [2,17,25]. Powyższy rezultat wskazuje na konieczność zachowania przez pracodawców umiaru we wdrażaniu standardów wykonywania pracy, które w znacznym stopniu wymuszają na pracownikach podejmowanie strategii udawania emocji.…”
Section: Omówienieunclassified