ESGE Days 2021 2021
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1724362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underwater- Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Sessile or Flat Colonic Polyps: Results of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…En bloc resection rate was also significantly higher: 89% (95%CI 81-94%) vs. 75% (95%CI 65-83%), P=0.007. Two more RCTs from Europe were published as abstracts [ 22 , 23 ]. The first [ 22 ] randomized 58 and 59 patients with large sessile or flat colonic lesions to U-EMR or C-EMR, respectively.…”
Section: Underwater Emr (U-emr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…En bloc resection rate was also significantly higher: 89% (95%CI 81-94%) vs. 75% (95%CI 65-83%), P=0.007. Two more RCTs from Europe were published as abstracts [ 22 , 23 ]. The first [ 22 ] randomized 58 and 59 patients with large sessile or flat colonic lesions to U-EMR or C-EMR, respectively.…”
Section: Underwater Emr (U-emr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two more RCTs from Europe were published as abstracts [ 22 , 23 ]. The first [ 22 ] randomized 58 and 59 patients with large sessile or flat colonic lesions to U-EMR or C-EMR, respectively. Preliminary results of this study showed similar en bloc resection rates (27.6% for U-EMR vs. 18.6% for C-EMR, P=0.27) and adverse events rates (15.5% for U-EMR vs. 16.9% C-EMR, P=0.1).…”
Section: Underwater Emr (U-emr)mentioning
confidence: 99%