2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uneven damage on head and liner contact surfaces of a retrieved Co–Cr-based metal-on-metal hip joint bearing: An important reason for the high failure rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UTS and 0.2% proof stress of CCM HPT ( 1709 MPa and 1528 MPa) are greater than those of CCM HF ( 1450 MPa and 1330 MPa). In addition, Vickers hardness of CCM HPT at half radius ( 503 HV) is greater than that of CCM HF ( 428 HV) reported for CCM alloy in practical use 5) . Therefore, it can be concluded that HPT processing helps to achieve greater tensile strength and hardness in CCM alloys than cold rolling and hot forging.…”
Section: Optimization Of Short Annealing Temperaturementioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…UTS and 0.2% proof stress of CCM HPT ( 1709 MPa and 1528 MPa) are greater than those of CCM HF ( 1450 MPa and 1330 MPa). In addition, Vickers hardness of CCM HPT at half radius ( 503 HV) is greater than that of CCM HF ( 428 HV) reported for CCM alloy in practical use 5) . Therefore, it can be concluded that HPT processing helps to achieve greater tensile strength and hardness in CCM alloys than cold rolling and hot forging.…”
Section: Optimization Of Short Annealing Temperaturementioning
confidence: 67%
“…In fact, CCM alloys with small grain size have been practically used. 5) It has been reported that hot forging 6) can re ne the CCM grains from an initial size of 40 µm to 0.6 µm. 6) However, grain renement to a nano-scale is dif cult to be achieved by the conventional processing methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such design offers greater range of motion, reduces risk of component-to-component impingement [3,4], while providing reduced articular wear. For several decades, biomedical cobalt-chrome-molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) alloys are employed for this application due to their favourable properties including high strength combined with excellent corrosion and wear resistance [5][6][7]. The wear resistance of these alloys is usually attributed to increased strain hardening and formation of carbide or nitride precipitates [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a well-known fact that the size and distribution of precipitates, grain size, and the amount of hexagonal closed packed (hcp) phase meaningfully affect the wear properties of CoCr alloys. The microstructure of CoCr alloys can be tailored via utilization of a surface modification technique, which can maintain excellent wear resistance while improving the biocompatibility of the alloy. To date, attempts to augment tribological properties of biomedical alloys have been focused on using numerous surface modifications techniques such as laser deposition of wear-resistant alloys and composites, laser-processed compositional gradient coatings, laser-assisted oxidation, thermal oxidation, diamond-like carbon coatings, and ion implantation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%