2023
DOI: 10.37349/etat.2023.00189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unexpected “Lazarus response” to single-agent bevacizumab in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

Alexey V. Emshanov,
Denis V. Nesterov,
Tatyana N. Sokolova
et al.

Abstract: Early clinical trials aimed to halt cancer progression by inhibiting the growth of new blood vessels in tumors through single-agent targeted therapy with bevacizumab. These trials largely proved unsuccessful. However, bevacizumab turned out to be efficient when administered in combination with other anticancer drugs. The efficacy of this approach is explained by the ability of bevacizumab to eliminate immature blood vessels thus normalizing intratumoral blood flow and improving the delivery of cytotoxic or tar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no clinical studies, with the exception of one case report, utilized bevacizumab [ 28 ]. Bevacizumab is believed to improve the delivery of anticancer drugs to cancer cells and may have a direct antitumor activity in some circumstances [ 29 , 30 , 31 ]. This report and a previous case observation suggest that the addition of bevacizumab may be essential for combined MEK and autophagy inhibition [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no clinical studies, with the exception of one case report, utilized bevacizumab [ 28 ]. Bevacizumab is believed to improve the delivery of anticancer drugs to cancer cells and may have a direct antitumor activity in some circumstances [ 29 , 30 , 31 ]. This report and a previous case observation suggest that the addition of bevacizumab may be essential for combined MEK and autophagy inhibition [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%