Unicast routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks: A critical comparison and classification

Bernsen, James; Manivannan, D.

doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2008.09.001

Cited by 138 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…6. For more detailed information we refer the reader to the VANET routing protocol survey papers of Blum et al [74], Maihofer [75], Li and Wang [76], Hartenstein and Laberteaux [77], Schoch et al [78], Bernsen and Manivannan [79], Hrizi and Filali [80], Lin et al [81] and Chen et al [82].…”

Section: Networked Vehiclesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adoption of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networking Protocols by Networked Robots

Vandenberghe

Moerman

Demeester

2012

Wireless Pers Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper focuses on the utilization of wireless networking in the robotics domain. Many researchers have already equipped their robots with wireless communication capabilities, stimulated by the observation that multi-robot systems tend to have several advantages over their single-robot counterparts. Typically, this integration of wireless communication is tackled in a quite pragmatic manner, only a few authors presented novel Robotic Ad Hoc Network (RANET) protocols that were designed specifically with robotic use cases in mind. This is in sharp contrast with the domain of vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET). This observation is the starting point of this paper. If the results of previous efforts focusing on VANET protocols could be reused in the RANET domain, this could lead to rapid progress in the field of networked robots. To investigate this possibility, this paper provides a thorough overview of the related work in the domain of robotic and vehicular ad hoc networks. Based on this information, an exhaustive list of requirements is defined for both types. It is concluded that the most significant difference lies in the fact that VANET protocols are oriented towards low throughput messaging, while RANET protocols have to support high throughput media streaming as well. Although not always with equal importance, all other defined requirements are valid for both protocols. This leads to the conclusion that cross-fertilization between them is an appealing approach for future RANET research. To support such developments, this paper concludes with the definition of an appropriate working plan.

show abstract

Section: Networked Vehiclesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adoption of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networking Protocols by Networked Robots

Vandenberghe

Moerman

Demeester

2012

Wireless Pers Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We evaluate our scheme through simulations and show that our proposed scheme provides reliable data delivery in VANETs. Routing protocols [2,3] in VANET have been studied extensively, especially based on mobile ad hoc networks (MANET). Generally, mobile ad hoc routing protocols aim to achieve reliable packet delivery and low delivery delay, with minimal communication overhead and network resource.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…VANET is a wireless ad-hoc network that consists of vehicles, where each vehicle is assumed to have wireless transceiver and acts as a network node [2] . Vehicular communications enable the users to communicate to roadside infrastructure or to each other for safety and transportation efficiency.…”

Section: ⅰ Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prediction-Based Reliable Data Forwarding Method in VANET

Kim¹,

Joo²

2017

The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Informati

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET) is one of technologies to realize various ITS services for safe driving and efficient traffic control. However, data delivery in VANETs is complicated due to high mobility and unreliable wireless transmission. In this paper, we develop a novel forwarding scheme to deliver packets in a reliable and timely manner. The proposed forwarding scheme uses traffic statistics to predict the encounter of two vehicles, and optimize its forwarding decision by taking into consideration the probability of successful transmission between them at the encounter place. We evaluate our scheme through simulations and show that our proposed scheme provides reliable data delivery in VANETs. Routing protocols [2,3] in VANET have been studied extensively, especially based on mobile ad hoc networks (MANET). Generally, mobile ad hoc routing protocols aim to achieve reliable packet delivery and low delivery delay, with minimal communication overhead and network resource.MANET routing protocols can be largely classified into two categories: proactive routing and reactive on-demand routing [5] . The proactive routing protocol calculates a route from one node to all other nodes in advance. Representative proactive protocols include Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector (DSDV) and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR).In contrast, the reactive routing protocol discovers a route only when it is explicitly requested. Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), and Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) are most widely used.Although many routing protocols that have been developed in MANET, most of them do not work well in VANET. It has been shown that many previous routing protocols for MANETs perform poorly in VANETs [6,7] . One of the main problems is that the previous routing protocols fail to achieve This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 summarizes related work. Section 3 provides the system model. Section 4 explains our data forwarding scheme, and Section 5 evaluates its performance. Finally, Section 6 concludes this paper. Ⅱ. Related WorkIn VANETs, many data forwarding schemes use the carry-and-forward approach, where a vehicle carries message until it can transmit the message to the destination or to a relay node. Traffic information (e.g., traffic density and average vehicle speed per road segment) is commonly used to guide the forwarding operation.Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) has been proposed to actively utilize wireless communications for forwarding [8] . In this protocol, a vehicle can transmit its packet to a neighboring vehicle that are geographically closer to the destination. In the meantime, if the vehicle with the packet is the closest to the destination among those in its neighbors, while it cannot directly transmit the packet to the destination yet, GPSR switches to its mode such that the packet can be forwarded following the right-hand rule (rather than the 130 shortest distance). GPSR outperforms DSR in many aspects [9] in terms of packet delivery ratio and overhead. Greedy Per...

show abstract

“…The only resemblance which can be tempted to consider is the "Ad hoc mobility" of MANET. However, numerous researchers already surveyed and came to the conclusion that VANET applications [3] are so diverse and its fundamental approach is so dissimilar that it needs another area of research. The major disparity of VANET from MANET is fast vehicles movement and certain mobility behavior.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

DDOR: Destination discovery oriented routing in highway/freeway VANETs+

Sahu

Sahoo

et al. 2010

Telecommun Syst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emerging adoption of wireless communications on surface transportation systems has generated extensive interest among researchers over the last several years. Innovative inter-vehicular communications and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications achieve road traffic safety, ecstatic driving and delightful travelling experiences. Multi-hop information dissemination in vehicular ad hoc networks is challenged by high mobility and frequent disconnections of wireless nodes. This paper presents a new routing scheme for Highway/Freeway VANETs, which consists of a unicast destination discovery process, a robust forward node selection mechanism and a positional hello mechanism. In this paper, no dedicated path is framed in order to prevent frequent path maintenance. In addition, the avoidance of flooding and location services substantially reduces the control overhead. Positional hello scheme ensures connectivity and diminishes control overhead concurrently. Simulation results signify the benefits of the proposed routing strategy (i.e. DDOR) has higher packet delivery ratio, Preliminary version was presented in Proceedings of IEEE APSCC 2008.

show abstract

Unicast routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks: A critical comparison and classification

Cited by 138 publications

References 55 publications

Adoption of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networking Protocols by Networked Robots

Adoption of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networking Protocols by Networked Robots

Prediction-Based Reliable Data Forwarding Method in VANET

DDOR: Destination discovery oriented routing in highway/freeway VANETs+

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About