1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf01399322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified error analysis for Newton-type methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in the perturbed case are new. Similar results concerning Newton's process can be found in the papers of P. Lancaster [2], J. Rokne [14] and G. Miel [3].…”
Section: D(x X*) <= ~(D(x_ ~+1 X_ ~) D(x X 1))supporting
confidence: 73%
“…The results obtained in the perturbed case are new. Similar results concerning Newton's process can be found in the papers of P. Lancaster [2], J. Rokne [14] and G. Miel [3].…”
Section: D(x X*) <= ~(D(x_ ~+1 X_ ~) D(x X 1))supporting
confidence: 73%
“…A further generalization was given by Dennis [4,5]. Miel [15,16] improved the error bounds for Rheinboldt [27]. Motet [18] obtained a convergence theorem as well as error bounds for the iteration (1.2) under the stronger conditions than those of Rheinboldt.…”
Section: =X--a(x) 1f(x)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Using our new idea of recurrent functions, a combination of Lipschitz and center-Lipschitz conditions, instead of only Lipschitz conditions, we provided an analysis with the following advantages over the works in [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]: weaker sufficient convergence conditions, and larger convergence domain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%