2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniformly sized β-cyclodextrin molecularly imprinted microspheres prepared by a novel surface imprinting technique for ursolic acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calibration curve that investigated using solutions with MTD concentrations of 0. 5,5,10,15,20,25,50,75,90,95, 100, 105, 115 and 120 µg mL -1 was linear in the range of about 15 to 100 µg mL -1 with coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 0.991. The limit of the detection of MTD using UV-Vis spectrophotometry was 2.31 µg mL -1 .…”
Section: Analytical Performance and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calibration curve that investigated using solutions with MTD concentrations of 0. 5,5,10,15,20,25,50,75,90,95, 100, 105, 115 and 120 µg mL -1 was linear in the range of about 15 to 100 µg mL -1 with coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 0.991. The limit of the detection of MTD using UV-Vis spectrophotometry was 2.31 µg mL -1 .…”
Section: Analytical Performance and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…2,3 Recently, MIPs, as highly selective solid adsorbents, have been widely used in various fields, such as separation and preconcentration, manufacturing of sensors, the stationary phases for chromatography, pseudo immunoassay, catalysis and others. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] In particular, new method of molecularly imprinted solid phase extraction (SPE), in which the MIP-solid adsorbent can selectively extract, has attracted much attention in the separation and enrichment area. 6,[10][11][12] The usual method for preparing MIPs, the entrapping way, has some disadvantages, such as time-consuming and complicated preparation method, less recognition sites within the matrix polymer particles obtained by crushing and grinding imprinted polymeric monolith, and greater diffuse barrier for the template molecules coming from matrix thickness, resulting in poor binding capacity and lower binding kinetics of MIPs to the template molecule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 It has been applied to a wide range of target molecules in the field of chromatography, solid phase extraction, controlled drug release, and sensor devices. [16][17][18] However, the traditional MIT has a few limitations, including permanent entrapment of the template and unfavorable kinetics of the adsorption. 19,20 To overcome these drawbacks effectively, the surface MIT was introduced with several advantages such as controllable size, better mechanism, and good reuse performance.…”
Section: Introduction Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydroxyl group on b-CDs can act as a polymerization terminal and then form a stable polymer matrix by virtue of a suitable cross-linker. b-CDs have been used as functional monomers or co-monomers to imprint various compounds, such as cholesterol, 77 tryptophan, 78 ursolic acid, 79 bilirubin, 80 dextromethorphan, 81 and cyclobarbital. 82 Generally, the molar ratios between template and monomer in the synthesis process affect the affinity and imprinting efficiency of MIPs.…”
Section: Reagents For Molecular Imprintingmentioning
confidence: 99%