Universal Darwinism As a Process of Bayesian Inference

Abstract

Many of the mathematical frameworks describing natural selection are equivalent to Bayes' Theorem, also known as Bayesian updating. By definition, a process of Bayesian Inference is one which involves a Bayesian update, so we may conclude that these frameworks describe natural selection as a process of Bayesian inference. Thus, natural selection serves as a counter example to a widely-held interpretation that restricts Bayesian Inference to human mental processes (including the endeavors of statisticians). As Bayesian inference can always be cast in terms of (variational) free energy minimization, natural selection can be viewed as comprising two components: a generative model of an “experiment” in the external world environment, and the results of that “experiment” or the “surprise” entailed by predicted and actual outcomes of the “experiment.” Minimization of free energy implies that the implicit measure of “surprise” experienced serves to update the generative model in a Bayesian manner. This description closely accords with the mechanisms of generalized Darwinian process proposed both by Dawkins, in terms of replicators and vehicles, and Campbell, in terms of inferential systems. Bayesian inference is an algorithm for the accumulation of evidence-based knowledge. This algorithm is now seen to operate over a wide range of evolutionary processes, including natural selection, the evolution of mental models and cultural evolutionary processes, notably including science itself. The variational principle of free energy minimization may thus serve as a unifying mathematical framework for universal Darwinism, the study of evolutionary processes operating throughout nature.

The More You Know, the More You Can Grow: An Information Theoretic Approach to Growth in the Information Age

“…Our equations also decompose growth in a similar manner, but use diversity metrics like entropies and mutual information instead. This expands recent work that has shown that natural selection expressed through replicator dynamics can be reformulated in terms of relative Kullback-Leibler entropy D KL [24][25][26][27]. Especially Frank [28,29] has worked out a clear link between relative entropy and Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection [30].…”

Free-energy minimization in joint agent-environment systems: A niche construction perspective

“…In terms of fitness, what matters is the time integral of variational free-energy (free action), given the locations that are actually visited (and outcomes experienced). More formally, from the perspective of the free-energy principle fitness corresponds to model evidence (Campbell, 2016, Frank, 2012): $\ln Ptrue(\tilde{o}true)\approx -Ftrue(\tilde{s},\pi ,{\theta }_{i}true)$…”

Breeding novel solutions in the brain: A model of Darwinian neurodynamics

“…The likelihood function is analogous to the fitness function and the posterior distribution to the selected population. Relations like this suggest that Bayesian update could be one of the pillars of “universal Darwinism” 33 . We believe that convincing models for neuro-evolution could empower Bayesian approaches by providing a mechanism to generate candidate hypotheses.…”