Universal Data Acquisition Module PIAP-UDAM for INDUSTRY 4.0 Application in Agriculture

Szewczyk, Roman; Petruk, Oleg; Kamiński, Marcin; Kłoda, Rafał; Piwiński, Jan; Winiarski, Wojciech; Stańczyk, Anna; Szałatkiewicz, Jakub

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13273-6_27

Cited by 1 publication

(5 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Those countries that have started implementing I4 elements into their food agricultural production (in the phases from planting to marketing) included India [ 13 , 16 , 17 , 31 ], Russia [ 12 , 64 ], the UK [ 67 , 87 ], Italy [ 74 ], Australia [ 28 , 57 ], Indonesia [ 71 ], the European Union (EU) [ 79 ], Malaysia [ 88 ], Poland [ 42 ], Spain [ 44 ], Poland and Israel [ 19 ], Moldova [ 89 ], China [ 27 ], and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) [ 85 ] ( Figure 9 and Figure 10 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…CPAS may be used to increase productivity and leverage agricultural supply networks. The IoT-based global agricultural production management and control system, according to the I4 idea, was introduced by Szewczyk et al [ 19 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Using an IoT-based approach, the broad rural creation of the board and control, as being necessary to the I4 notion, was proposed by Szewczyk et al [ 19 ]. The four levels of the proposed framework—choice assistance, information handling, information collecting and transmission, and sensors—will be tested in Poland and Israel.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The topics of Agriculture-Industry 4.0 (I4) [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] and Foods-I4 [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ,…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…First, food comes from agriculture. Studies and talks on deploying I4 in agriculture to increase food security for the growing population have been well reported [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. That was a smart move.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Conceptual Model Relationship between Industry 4.0—Food-Agriculture Nexus and Agroecosystem: A Literature Review and Knowledge Gaps

Yap,

Al-Mutairi

2024

Foods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the expected colonization of human daily life by artificial intelligence, including in industry productivity, the deployment of Industry 4.0 (I4) in the food agriculture industry (FAI) is expected to revolutionize and galvanize food production to increase the efficiency of the industry’s production and to match, in tandem, a country’s gross domestic productivity. Based on a literature review, there have been almost no direct relationships between the I4—Food-Agriculture (I4FA) Nexus and the agroecosystem. This study aimed to evaluate the state-of-the-art relationships between the I4FA Nexus and the agroecosystem and to discuss the challenges in the sustainable FAI that can be assisted by the I4 technologies. This objective was fulfilled by (a) reviewing all the relevant publications and (b) drawing a conceptual relationship between the I4FA Nexus and the agroecosystem, in which the I4FA Nexus is categorized into socio-economic and environmental (SEE) perspectives. Four points are highlighted in the present review. First, I4 technology is projected to grow in the agricultural and food sectors today and in the future. Second, food agriculture output may benefit from I4 by considering the SEE benefits. Third, implementing I4 is a challenging journey for the sustainable FAI, especially for the small to medium enterprises (SMEs). Fourth, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles can help to manage I4’s implementation in agriculture and food. The advantages of I4 deployment include (a) social benefits like increased occupational safety, workers’ health, and food quality, security, and safety; (b) economic benefits, like using sensors to reduce agricultural food production costs, and the food supply chain; and (c) environmental benefits like reducing chemical leaching and fertilizer use. However, more studies are needed to address social adaptability, trust, privacy, and economic income uncertainty, especially in SMEs or in businesses or nations with lower resources; this will require time for adaptation to make the transition away from human ecology. For agriculture to be ESG-sustainable, the deployment of I4FA could be an answer with the support of an open-minded dialogue platform with ESG-minded leaders to complement sustainable agroecosystems on a global scale.

show abstract