2018
DOI: 10.22543/7674.51.p123128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unmodifiable variables related to thyroid cancer incidence

Abstract: The incidence of thyroid cancer is significantly different between male and female patients. Thyroid cancer is also the only form of cancer where age can be considered a staging variable. Identifying biological prognostic factors such as age or sex is important as it helps select an optimal personalized therapy. The present analysis is an observational, prospective study that enrolled all patients with thyroid disease who were operated upon at a single center. The study aimed to determine the most frequent age… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our results support a conclusion stating the male sex to be generally a poor WDTK prognostic factor [5,15,16]. The analysis of patients age-dependent cumulative survival was carried out for 4 patients groups; it is recently recommended taking into consideration actual discussion about the necessity of age border correction (before and after 45 years) being accounted during the disease stage determination according to the 7th version of the TNM Classification [5,9,10,[15][16][17]. The worst results among the cohort patients are found for persons above 60 ( Figure 1А), whilst the survival index for 19-60 years old patients fluctuates in limits 98.0-99.9 %, reaching 100 % for persons below 18 ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, our results support a conclusion stating the male sex to be generally a poor WDTK prognostic factor [5,15,16]. The analysis of patients age-dependent cumulative survival was carried out for 4 patients groups; it is recently recommended taking into consideration actual discussion about the necessity of age border correction (before and after 45 years) being accounted during the disease stage determination according to the 7th version of the TNM Classification [5,9,10,[15][16][17]. The worst results among the cohort patients are found for persons above 60 ( Figure 1А), whilst the survival index for 19-60 years old patients fluctuates in limits 98.0-99.9 %, reaching 100 % for persons below 18 ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…According to some data, the sex has been determined as a probable prognostic factor using onefactorial analysis; the multifactorial analysis approach, however, has not confirmed this assertion [14]. Nevertheless, our results support a conclusion stating the male sex to be generally a poor WDTK prognostic factor [5,15,16]. The analysis of patients age-dependent cumulative survival was carried out for 4 patients groups; it is recently recommended taking into consideration actual discussion about the necessity of age border correction (before and after 45 years) being accounted during the disease stage determination according to the 7th version of the TNM Classification [5,9,10,[15][16][17].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results, however, support conclusions suggesting the male sex to be an unfavorable prognostic factor for patients with papillary carcinoma [7,10,13]. Analysis of age-dependent cumulative patients survival has been carried out for 4 patient groups, as it is currently recommended, taking into consideration a recent discussion regarding the necessity of age limit correction (before and after 45 years), this limit being taken into account when the disease stage is to be determined [3,5,7,9,10,13]. Among our cohort patients, the worst results have been found for persons above 60 років.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Follow-up during treatment included physical and dermatological examinations, biological tests, including TSH, FT3, FT4 and imaging revaluation at six months [35,36].…”
Section: Fig 3 Radiotherapy Treatment Planmentioning
confidence: 99%