“…Several methods of recognizing unreliable CBC results are described, including automated or manual review of analyzer-generated flags, delta check failures, review based on expectation or predefined quality control rules, visual inspection of the blood specimen tube, and blood smear examination [ 11 ]. Detailed examples of unreliable automated CBC results and methods for obtaining reliable results are provided for each listed cause; for interfering substances: lipemia, hemolysis, hyperbilirubinemia, red cell agglutinins, white cell agglutinins, platelet agglutinins, hyperproteinemia/paraproteinemia, cryoproteinemia, organisms, hyperglycemia, adipose tissue fragments/flat globules, fibrin clumps, small clots in the specimen tube; and for abnormal cells or cellular phenomena: red cell fragments/schistocytes, extremely microcytic red cells, lysis-resistant red cells, hyperleukocytosis, giant platelets, cytoplasmic fragments of leukocytes, platelet satellitosis, nucleated red blood cells, megakaryocytes, and non-hematopoietic cells [ 11 ]. For each example, a general description, the impact on CBC parameters, methods for recognizing unreliable results, methods for obtaining reliable results encompassing multiple approaches, including sample processing and calculational methods, and example cases with initial and re-run CBC results are described in detail based on the literature or the authors’ experiences.…”