2005
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updated and revised nomenclature for description of early pregnancy events

Abstract: The nomenclature used to describe clinical events in early pregnancy has been criticized for lack of clarity and promoting confusion. There is no agreed glossary of terms or consensus regarding important gestational milestones. In particular there are old and poorly descriptive terms such as 'missed abortion' and 'blighted ovum', which have persisted since their introduction many years ago (Robinson, 1975) and have not undergone revision despite the widespread application of ultrasound for accurate clinical as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
97
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
97
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Criteria for the diagnosis of EPL were as follows: (a) the absence of an embryo with a heartbeat ≥2 weeks after a scan that showed a gestational sac without a yolk sac; (b) a nonviable embryonic pregnancy confirmed on the first scan in which the embryonic pole length was ≥7 mm; or if the embryonic pole length was <7 mm on the first scan and nonviability was confirmed based on reproducible evidence of the absence of fetal heart activity; or if the embryonic pole failed to lengthen over 1 week; and (c) an embryonic pregnancy that was viable at the initial scan but had no observable fetal heart activity at the 12th week [20].…”
Section: Ultrasound Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criteria for the diagnosis of EPL were as follows: (a) the absence of an embryo with a heartbeat ≥2 weeks after a scan that showed a gestational sac without a yolk sac; (b) a nonviable embryonic pregnancy confirmed on the first scan in which the embryonic pole length was ≥7 mm; or if the embryonic pole length was <7 mm on the first scan and nonviability was confirmed based on reproducible evidence of the absence of fetal heart activity; or if the embryonic pole failed to lengthen over 1 week; and (c) an embryonic pregnancy that was viable at the initial scan but had no observable fetal heart activity at the 12th week [20].…”
Section: Ultrasound Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes were defined according to the terminology provided by the ICMART (International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies) glossary [44] and the updated and revised nomenclature for the description of early pregnancy events [14].…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the traditional grouping of all pregnancy losses before 20 weeks has been revised. 5 Standard investigations fail to reveal any apparent cause in .50% of the women. 1,2 On the basis of a parallel drawn with the antiphospholipid syndrome, hypotheses on thrombotic mechanisms were raised in unexplained pregnancy loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%