1991
DOI: 10.1300/j124v08n04_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upgrading Minimal Level Monographic Records:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fox and Preece (1991) and Preece and Fox (1992) cover issues most closely related to vendor records. They discuss three reasons to upgrade minimallevel records: (1) to provide increased patron service through complete cataloging; (2) to maintain the library's commitment to quality cataloging; and (3) to enhance record quality for the online catalog (Fox and Preece 1991). As with vendor records, the minimal-level records in their study had no subject headings and there was no authority control for access points.…”
Section: Minimal-level Records and Duplicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fox and Preece (1991) and Preece and Fox (1992) cover issues most closely related to vendor records. They discuss three reasons to upgrade minimallevel records: (1) to provide increased patron service through complete cataloging; (2) to maintain the library's commitment to quality cataloging; and (3) to enhance record quality for the online catalog (Fox and Preece 1991). As with vendor records, the minimal-level records in their study had no subject headings and there was no authority control for access points.…”
Section: Minimal-level Records and Duplicationmentioning
confidence: 99%