2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upscaling permeability anisotropy in digital sandstones using convolutional neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, using 3D data volume as input, although CNN has good accuracy and relatively low computational cost compared to numerical methods, CNN still requires high computational costs during training (Siavashi et al., 2022). Meanwhile, there is a contradiction that the resolution needs to be sacrificed to expand the scanning field of view (Najafi et al., 2021; Siavashi et al., 2022). In this regard, 2D slices are cheaper and more available experimentally, compare with 3D structured data volumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, using 3D data volume as input, although CNN has good accuracy and relatively low computational cost compared to numerical methods, CNN still requires high computational costs during training (Siavashi et al., 2022). Meanwhile, there is a contradiction that the resolution needs to be sacrificed to expand the scanning field of view (Najafi et al., 2021; Siavashi et al., 2022). In this regard, 2D slices are cheaper and more available experimentally, compare with 3D structured data volumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generated results of PSS can be questionable due to the trade‐off between the spatial resolution and FOV of μ xCT images (Najafi et al., 2021; Yue et al., 2016). The addressed trade‐off can result in failure to capture pore sizes less than the spatial resolution and consequently gives rise to uncertainty of pore geometry (Blykers et al., 2021; Saxena, Hofmann, Alpak, Berg, et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%