2021
DOI: 10.1002/adsu.202100026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uptake and Adoption of Sustainable Energy Technologies: Prioritizing Strategies to Overcome Barriers in the Construction Industry by Using an Integrated AHP‐TOPSIS Approach

Abstract: Energy conservation through sustainable energy technologies (SETs) in the construction industry is capturing considerable attention worldwide. However, the presence of challenges makes SETs implementation difficult, and hence to increase the effective adoption of SETs, potential strategies are essential to overcome challenges. The objective of this study is to identify and rank major strategies of SETs adoption in the construction sector to overcome its barriers. This study proposes an integrated framework bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most developing countries are unaware of the numerous benefits that sustainable construction may offer, making it difficult for their employees to adopt sustainability principles (Simpeh & Smallwood, 2015). Limited knowledge of sustainable construction approaches has also been identified as a key impediment to the adoption of sustainable construction approaches in construction projects due to incorrect information about sustainability technology (Iqbal et al, 2021). According to the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP, 2010), understanding of sustainable construction approaches among many professionals is limited, making it difficult for such professionals to incorporate sustainability initiatives into their projects.…”
Section: Lack Of Knowledge and Awareness To New Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most developing countries are unaware of the numerous benefits that sustainable construction may offer, making it difficult for their employees to adopt sustainability principles (Simpeh & Smallwood, 2015). Limited knowledge of sustainable construction approaches has also been identified as a key impediment to the adoption of sustainable construction approaches in construction projects due to incorrect information about sustainability technology (Iqbal et al, 2021). According to the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP, 2010), understanding of sustainable construction approaches among many professionals is limited, making it difficult for such professionals to incorporate sustainability initiatives into their projects.…”
Section: Lack Of Knowledge and Awareness To New Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, various MCDM methods can perform the same analysis, e.g., data mining, TOPSIS, game theory, analytical hierarchy processing (AHP) and Bayesian theory. The comparison of these approaches with [48,[55][56][57][58] is given in Table 4. Raj and Shankar [59] defined some attractive features of the ISM technique, which are given below:…”
Section: Saudi Arabia Ism Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [46][47][48][49] stated that ISM transforms erroneous and unclear models into precise and visible models. Different studies employing ISM and MICMAC techniques are listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Interpretive Structural Modeling (Ism)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Enshassi et al, (2018), contractors should adopt energy conservation measures in the building projects to minimize the energy consumption in urban territories, which also could be beneficial for contractors in terms of cost-saving. Different financial schemes such as subsidies, economic, and tax policies are also considered significant DFs to promote EMPs (Iqbal et al 2021d;Enshassi et al 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Ravi and Shankar (2005) examine that the minimum number of respondents in the ISM-MICMAC approach should be two. Iqbal et al (2021d) used nine experts to identify the obstacles regarding the adoption of energy efficiency in the construction sector. Most of the previous studies (Bux et al 2020;Hussain et al 2019) employed less than fifteen experts as a sample enough for the ISM-MICMAC approach.…”
Section: Application Of Ismmentioning
confidence: 99%