2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urokinase/urokinase receptor and vitronectin/αvβ3 integrin induce chemotaxis and cytoskeleton reorganization through different signaling pathways

Abstract: Vitronectin (VN) and pro-urokinase (pro-uPA) stimulated migration of rat smooth muscle cells in a dosedependent and additive way, and induced motile-type changes in cell morphology together with a complete reorganization of the actin ®laments and of the microtubules. All these e ects were inhibited by pertussis toxin, or by antibodies directed against the urokinase receptor (uPAR) or against the VN receptor a v b 3 suggesting that an association between the two receptors is required to mediate both signals. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
75
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly identified effect is one of "deadhesion", where cells can be released from one matrix footprint (often fibronectin) in order to move forward and attach to another matrix protein such as VN (24). PAI-1 and the locally concentrated active enzyme urokinase are regulators that promote cell detachment and migration by disrupting these VN-uPAR and VN-integrin interactions (70,71,79). In the obstructive uropathy model, uPAR deletion was associated with significantly fewer numbers of interstitial macrophages, perhaps due to the disruption of this pathway (30).…”
Section: Upar Lateral Interactions With Co-receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly identified effect is one of "deadhesion", where cells can be released from one matrix footprint (often fibronectin) in order to move forward and attach to another matrix protein such as VN (24). PAI-1 and the locally concentrated active enzyme urokinase are regulators that promote cell detachment and migration by disrupting these VN-uPAR and VN-integrin interactions (70,71,79). In the obstructive uropathy model, uPAR deletion was associated with significantly fewer numbers of interstitial macrophages, perhaps due to the disruption of this pathway (30).…”
Section: Upar Lateral Interactions With Co-receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independent of proteolysis, u-PA enhances cell invasion through activation of several migration-associated signalling molecules such as extracellular signal-regulated kinases (Nguyen et al, 1998), focal adhesion kinases (Tang et al, 1998) and signal transducers and activators of transcription 1 (STAT1) (Dumler et al, 1998). Such intercellular signal transduction is apparently facilitated by the interaction of u-PAR with integrins (Wei et al, 1996;Degryse et al, 2001) and cytoskeletal components (Xue et al, 1997). In addition, u-PA/u-PAR mediates cellular adhesion to the ECM protein, vitronectin directly through integrin-independent, highaffinity interaction between u-PAR and vitronectin, and indirectly through function modifying lateral associations with integrin family members (Xue et al, 1997;Degryse et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such intercellular signal transduction is apparently facilitated by the interaction of u-PAR with integrins (Wei et al, 1996;Degryse et al, 2001) and cytoskeletal components (Xue et al, 1997). In addition, u-PA/u-PAR mediates cellular adhesion to the ECM protein, vitronectin directly through integrin-independent, highaffinity interaction between u-PAR and vitronectin, and indirectly through function modifying lateral associations with integrin family members (Xue et al, 1997;Degryse et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Second, uPAR, the closest known homologue to C4.4A, induces cell migration either via G protein-coupled receptors 49 or via integrin binding. 50,51 However, C4.4A does not share integrin binding with uPAR. In several carcinoma lines amply expressing a wide range of integrins, integrin precipitates did not contain C4.4A and vice versa.…”
Section: C44a-ln Binding and Cell Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%