Usability Evaluation of Business Process Modeling Standards – BPMN and BORM Case Study

Pavlicek, Josef; Rod, Martin; Pavlickova, Petra

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79022-6_9

Cited by 3 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, from our experience [14,16,17], there is a criticism of this solution as in Table 7. utility patent -PUV 2016-32993) actually responds to the shortcomings of the original architecture.…”

Section: Participant-oriented Ui Labmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…The term Usability is defined [13] by the international standardization organization ISO (ISO / TR 16982: 2002 standard) as authors quote: [14] ISO/TR 16982:2002 ("Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Usability methods supporting humancentered design") is an International Standards Organization (ISO) standard that provides information on human-centered usability methods that can be used for design and evaluation. It details the advantages, disadvantages, and other factors relevant to using each usability method.…”

Section: Usabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…• Participants: This is generally heuristic analysis and cognitive walkthrough • On collaboration: Cognitive walkthrough and collaborative walkthrough [14,16,17]…”

Section: Ui Labmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It also allows pair testing or interacting (collaborative) testing. This is the innovative approach promoted by see [14,16,17].…”

Section: Participant-oriented Ui Labmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A laboratory for collaborative testing [3,14,16,17,20] characterized in that it comprises two substantially semicircular tables (1), each containing at least three workstations, each station containing a computer, a monitor (2) with a camera for capturing a user's face, a headset and a microphone, audio recording means, wherein the tables ( 1) are positioned such that the center of the imaginary circle of which the table ( 1) is a part faces the other table (1), and further, the axes of symmetry of the two tables (1) are parallel and offset from each other, and the monitors (2) of the workstations are arranged on each table (1) such that the screens are oriented away from the other table, wherein the central workstation of each table is provided with means (3) for tracking eye movements, and wherein the laboratory further comprises at least two speakers and at least four wideangle cameras (51, 52), at least two of the cameras (52) being arranged to image the workstations including the screens of the monitors (2).…”

Section: Advantages Disadvantagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Usability Testing Methods and Usability Laboratory Management

Pavlicek¹,

Pavlickova²

2023

Updates on Software Usability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Usability testing of software products is of key importance nowadays. In order for usability testing to have the desired effect, the appropriate testing methodology must be chosen. Usability testing can be carried out using qualitative or quantitative methods. A widely used qualitative method today is the heuristic evaluation proposed by Jacob Nielsen. However, there are other testing methods such as cognitive walkthrough or collaborative testing (proposed by Josef Pavlicek and R. Bock). Although heuristic analysis has generally received a lot of attention in the current literature, it is important to put the other methods in the right light. These provide a significantly better view of the user’s passage through the interface under test. The methods better simulate the environment in which the final UI will operate. The user experience (UX) is then significantly better measurable if the participant goes through the test scenario in a cognitive (i.e., mental model-defined) way, rather than by mere heuristic evaluation. A significant milestone is then the cognitive-collaborative passage, where the collaborative element of the evaluators contributes to the evaluation of the solution.

show abstract

Section: Participant-oriented Ui Labmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Usabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…• Participants: This is generally heuristic analysis and cognitive walkthrough • On collaboration: Cognitive walkthrough and collaborative walkthrough [14,16,17]…”

Section: Ui Labmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It also allows pair testing or interacting (collaborative) testing. This is the innovative approach promoted by see [14,16,17].…”

Section: Participant-oriented Ui Labmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Advantages Disadvantagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations