2019
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a personalized iterative score to evaluate risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and puerperium

Abstract: Objective To determine whether a personalized iterative venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk score improved preventive prophylaxis during pregnancy and puerperium. Methods An observational retrospective comparative study was conducted at single French hospital. Women who gave birth from February 1 to April 30, 2012 (n=557) or from February 1 to April 30, 2015 (n=512) underwent VTE risk assessment. The VTE risk score comprised known risk factors for this condition. Results Use of the VTE risk score at the first co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…153 Use of proper thrombo-embolic risk assessment tools have been recently proposed during pregnancy and puerperium demonstrating their efficacy in proper patient management. 154…”
Section: Ulcer Healing and Recurrence A Fundamental Paper Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…153 Use of proper thrombo-embolic risk assessment tools have been recently proposed during pregnancy and puerperium demonstrating their efficacy in proper patient management. 154…”
Section: Ulcer Healing and Recurrence A Fundamental Paper Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every clinical decision should be based on a detailed, documented risk assessment of the VTE risk of each pregnant woman in early pregnancy, upon modification of any of the risk factors and postpartum. Several VTE risk scores have been devised to guide clinical decision-making [49], some of which have demonstrated clinical significance in guiding appropriate thromboprophylaxis [50,51], and reducing the incidence of VTE [51]. Nevertheless, all of these reports contain limitations in methodology and should be critically assessed by the practicing physician.…”
Section: Vte Prophylaxis In Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 summarises the process of identifying and selecting relevant literature. Of the 2268 citations identified, 16 studies [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] investigating 19 unique externally validated RAMs met the inclusion criteria. Only one of these studies 35 presented data on model development and external validation (this study used UK Clinical Practice Research Data linked to Hospital Episode Statistics to develop a risk prediction model and externally validated using Swedish medical birth registry data).…”
Section: Study Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies included in this review evaluated 19 externally validated RAMs [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] and 1 internally validated risk model. 39 While most RAMs focused solely on the estimate of thromboembolic risk, RAMs varied in design, structure, threshold, dosage and duration for pharmacological prophylaxis.…”
Section: Ramsmentioning
confidence: 99%