2001
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(2001)127:3(126)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Belief Function in Brownfield Infrastructure Redevelopment Decision Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The revealed factors and their relevancy for brownfield regeneration do not explicitly suggest action that should be necessarily conducted by decision-makers; it should rather serve as one of the background documents for wide distribution of regeneration funding. Together with the previous studies [28][29][30][31][32], we propose one of the possible perspectives on brownfield regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The revealed factors and their relevancy for brownfield regeneration do not explicitly suggest action that should be necessarily conducted by decision-makers; it should rather serve as one of the background documents for wide distribution of regeneration funding. Together with the previous studies [28][29][30][31][32], we propose one of the possible perspectives on brownfield regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…A wide variety of methods to date deal with one or a number of aspects of brownfield revitalization such as risk assessment (e.g., Carlon et al, 2008;Semenzin et al, 2006;Strenge and Chamberlain, 1995), policy analysis (e.g., Linkov et al, 2006), optimization of remediation (e.g., Ahlfeld et al, 1995;Bürger et al, 2007;Wang and McTernan, 2002), remediation cost assessment (e.g., Kaufman et al, 2005), general success factors for brownfield redevelopment (e.g., Lange and McNeil, 2004;Nijkamp et al, 2002), infrastructure redevelopment (Attoh-Okine and Gibbons, 2001), urban planning and site prioritization under budget constraints (e.g., AlvarezGuerra et al, 2009;Stevens et al, 2007) and mediation of negotiation (Sounderpandian et al, 2005).…”
Section: Necessity For Appropriate Decision Support Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications of DS theory in civil and environmental engineering vary from slope stability (Binaghi et al, 1998), environmental decision-making (Attoh-Okine and Gibbons, 2001;Chang and Wright, 1996), seismic analysis (Alim, 1988), failure detection (Tanaka and Klir, 1999), construction management (Sönmez et al, 2002), water quality and water treatment (Sadiq and Rodriguez, 2005;Demotier et al, 2005;Boyd et al, 1993), pipe deterioration modeling (Najjaran et al, 2005), and remote sensing (Wang and Civco, 1994) to climate change (Luo and Caselton, 1997). Many more engineering applications of DS theory can be seen in detailed bibliography provided by Sentz and Ferson (2002).…”
Section: Dempster-shafer (Ds) Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%